On 03/27/12 09:37, Uros Bizjak wrote: >> > Now, in this particular case, there might be another option to >> > avoid this hassle completely: I understand that this UNSPEC is >> > simply a magic marker to make the address use the fs: or gs: >> > segment override, right? Now that GCC supports address spaces, >> > it might be possible to model fs:/gs: relative addresses instead >> > by using a non-standard address space ... > This is an interesting idea, I will look into it.
Generallized segment overrides via non-standard address spaces has been on my to-do list for quite a while... r~
