Hi,

As the failure of test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9-.c in
PR106345 shows, some test sources for some powerpc effective
targets use empty translation unit wrongly.  The test sources
could go with options like "-ansi -pedantic-errors", then those
effective target checkings will fail unexpectedly with the
error messages like:

  error: ISO C forbids an empty translation unit [-Wpedantic]

This patch is to fix empty TUs with one dummy function definition
accordingly.

Excepting for the failures on gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9-.c
fixed, I can see it helps to bring back some testing coverage like:

NA->PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9+.c
NA->PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/pr93453-1.c

Tested as before.

v1: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-July/598602.html
v2: Use dummy function instead of dummy int as Segher suggested.

Segher, does this v2 look good to you?

BR,
Kewen
-----
        PR testsuite/106345

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_powerpc_sqrt): Add
        a function definition to avoid pedwarn about empty translation unit.
        (check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr5): Likewise.
        (check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr6): Likewise.
        (check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr7): Likewise.
        (check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr8): Likewise.
        (check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr9): Likewise.
        (check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr10): Likewise.
        (check_effective_target_has_arch_ppc64): Likewise.
        (check_effective_target_ppc_float128): Likewise.
        (check_effective_target_ppc_float128_insns): Likewise.
        (check_effective_target_powerpc_vsx): Likewise.
---
 gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp 
b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index 4ed7b25b9a4..06484330178 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
@@ -6259,9 +6259,12 @@ proc check_effective_target_powerpc_sqrt { } {
     }

     return [check_no_compiler_messages powerpc_sqrt object {
+       void test (void)
+       {
        #ifndef _ARCH_PPCSQ
        #error _ARCH_PPCSQ is not defined
        #endif
+       }
     } {}]
 }

@@ -6369,71 +6372,92 @@ proc check_effective_target_powerpc_p9modulo_ok { } {
 # as provided by the test.
 proc check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr5 { } {
        return [check_no_compiler_messages_nocache arch_pwr5 assembly {
+               void test (void)
+               {
                #ifndef _ARCH_PWR5
                #error does not have power5 support.
                #else
                /* "has power5 support" */
                #endif
+               }
        } [current_compiler_flags]]
 }

 proc check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr6 { } {
        return [check_no_compiler_messages_nocache arch_pwr6 assembly {
+               void test (void)
+               {
                #ifndef _ARCH_PWR6
                #error does not have power6 support.
                #else
                /* "has power6 support" */
                #endif
+               }
        } [current_compiler_flags]]
 }

 proc check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr7 { } {
        return [check_no_compiler_messages_nocache arch_pwr7 assembly {
+               void test (void)
+               {
                #ifndef _ARCH_PWR7
                #error does not have power7 support.
                #else
                /* "has power7 support" */
                #endif
+               }
        } [current_compiler_flags]]
 }

 proc check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr8 { } {
        return [check_no_compiler_messages_nocache arch_pwr8 assembly {
+               void test (void)
+               {
                #ifndef _ARCH_PWR8
                #error does not have power8 support.
                #else
                /* "has power8 support" */
                #endif
+               }
        } [current_compiler_flags]]
 }

 proc check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr9 { } {
        return [check_no_compiler_messages_nocache arch_pwr9 assembly {
+               void test (void)
+               {
                #ifndef _ARCH_PWR9
                #error does not have power9 support.
                #else
                /* "has power9 support" */
                #endif
+               }
        } [current_compiler_flags]]
 }

 proc check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr10 { } {
        return [check_no_compiler_messages_nocache arch_pwr10 assembly {
+               void test (void)
+               {
                #ifndef _ARCH_PWR10
                #error does not have power10 support.
                #else
                /* "has power10 support" */
                #endif
+               }
        } [current_compiler_flags]]
 }

 proc check_effective_target_has_arch_ppc64 { } {
        return [check_no_compiler_messages_nocache arch_ppc64 assembly {
+               void test (void)
+               {
                #ifndef _ARCH_PPC64
                #error does not have ppc64 support.
                #else
                /* "has ppc64 support" */
                #endif
+               }
        } [current_compiler_flags]]
 }

@@ -6520,9 +6544,12 @@ proc check_effective_target_powerpc_float128_hw_ok { } {

 proc check_effective_target_ppc_float128 { } {
     return [check_no_compiler_messages_nocache ppc_float128 object {
+       void test (void)
+       {
        #ifndef __FLOAT128__
          nope no good
        #endif
+       }
     }]
 }

@@ -6530,9 +6557,12 @@ proc check_effective_target_ppc_float128 { } {

 proc check_effective_target_ppc_float128_insns { } {
     return [check_no_compiler_messages_nocache ppc_float128 object {
+       void test (void)
+       {
        #ifndef __FLOAT128_HARDWARE__
          nope no good
        #endif
+       }
     }]
 }

@@ -6540,9 +6570,12 @@ proc check_effective_target_ppc_float128_insns { } {

 proc check_effective_target_powerpc_vsx { } {
     return [check_no_compiler_messages_nocache powerpc_vsx object {
+       void test (void)
+       {
        #ifndef __VSX__
          nope no vsx
        #endif
+       }
     }]
 }

--
2.32.0

Reply via email to