Hi!

On 2022-07-01T23:08:16+0200, Tobias Burnus <tob...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Updated version attached – I hope I got everything right, but I start to
> get tired, I am not 100% sure.

..., and so the obligatory copy'n'past-o ;-) crept in:

> --- a/gcc/lto-cgraph.cc
> +++ b/gcc/lto-cgraph.cc

> @@ -1773,6 +1804,10 @@ input_offload_tables (bool do_force_output)
>    struct lto_file_decl_data **file_data_vec = lto_get_file_decl_data ();
>    struct lto_file_decl_data *file_data;
>    unsigned int j = 0;
> +  const char *requires_fn = NULL;
> +  tree requires_decl = NULL_TREE;
> +
> +  omp_requires_mask = (omp_requires) 0;
>
>    while ((file_data = file_data_vec[j++]))
>      {
> @@ -1784,6 +1819,7 @@ input_offload_tables (bool do_force_output)
>        if (!ib)
>       continue;
>
> +      tree tmp_decl = NULL_TREE;
>        enum LTO_symtab_tags tag
>       = streamer_read_enum (ib, LTO_symtab_tags, LTO_symtab_last_tag);
>        while (tag)
> @@ -1799,6 +1835,7 @@ input_offload_tables (bool do_force_output)
>                LTO mode.  */
>             if (do_force_output)
>               cgraph_node::get (fn_decl)->mark_force_output ();
> +           tmp_decl = fn_decl;
>           }
>         else if (tag == LTO_symtab_variable)
>           {
> @@ -1810,6 +1847,72 @@ input_offload_tables (bool do_force_output)
>                may be no refs to var_decl in offload LTO mode.  */
>             if (do_force_output)
>               varpool_node::get (var_decl)->force_output = 1;
> +           tmp_decl = var_decl;
> +         }
> +       else if (tag == LTO_symtab_edge)
> +         {
> +           static bool error_emitted = false;
> +           HOST_WIDE_INT val = streamer_read_hwi (ib);
> +
> +           if (omp_requires_mask == 0)
> +             {
> +               omp_requires_mask = (omp_requires) val;
> +               requires_decl = tmp_decl;
> +               requires_fn = file_data->file_name;
> +             }
> +           else if (omp_requires_mask != val && !error_emitted)
> +             {
> +               const char *fn1 = requires_fn;
> +               if (requires_decl != NULL_TREE)
> +                 {
> +                   while (DECL_CONTEXT (requires_decl) != NULL_TREE
> +                          && TREE_CODE (requires_decl) != 
> TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL)
> +                     requires_decl = DECL_CONTEXT (requires_decl);
> +                   if (requires_decl != NULL_TREE)
> +                     fn1 = IDENTIFIER_POINTER (DECL_NAME (requires_decl));
> +                 }
> +
> +               const char *fn2 = file_data->file_name;
> +               if (tmp_decl != NULL_TREE)
> +                 {
> +                   while (DECL_CONTEXT (tmp_decl) != NULL_TREE
> +                          && TREE_CODE (tmp_decl) != TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL)
> +                     tmp_decl = DECL_CONTEXT (tmp_decl);
> +                   if (tmp_decl != NULL_TREE)
> +                     fn2 = IDENTIFIER_POINTER (DECL_NAME (requires_decl));
> +                 }

... here: tmp_decl' not 'requires_decl'.  OK to push the attached
"Fix one issue in OpenMP 'requires' directive diagnostics"?

I'd even push that one "as obvious", but thought I'd ask whether you
maybe have a quick idea about the XFAILs that I'm adding?  (I'm otherwise
not planning on resolving that issue at this time.)

> +
> +               char buf1[sizeof ("unified_address, unified_shared_memory, "
> +                                 "reverse_offload")];
> +               char buf2[sizeof ("unified_address, unified_shared_memory, "
> +                                 "reverse_offload")];
> +               omp_requires_to_name (buf2, sizeof (buf2),
> +                                     val != OMP_REQUIRES_TARGET_USED
> +                                     ? val
> +                                     : (HOST_WIDE_INT) omp_requires_mask);
> +               if (val != OMP_REQUIRES_TARGET_USED
> +                   && omp_requires_mask != OMP_REQUIRES_TARGET_USED)
> +                 {
> +                   omp_requires_to_name (buf1, sizeof (buf1),
> +                                         omp_requires_mask);
> +                   error ("OpenMP %<requires%> directive with non-identical "
> +                          "clauses in multiple compilation units: %qs vs. "
> +                          "%qs", buf1, buf2);
> +                   inform (UNKNOWN_LOCATION, "%qs has %qs", fn1, buf1);
> +                   inform (UNKNOWN_LOCATION, "%qs has %qs", fn2, buf2);
> +                 }
> +               else
> +                 {
> +                   error ("OpenMP %<requires%> directive with %qs specified "
> +                          "only in some compilation units", buf2);
> +                   inform (UNKNOWN_LOCATION, "%qs has %qs",
> +                           val != OMP_REQUIRES_TARGET_USED ? fn2 : fn1,
> +                           buf2);
> +                   inform (UNKNOWN_LOCATION, "but %qs has not",
> +                           val != OMP_REQUIRES_TARGET_USED ? fn1 : fn2);
> +                 }
> +               error_emitted = true;
> +             }
>           }
>         else
>           fatal_error (input_location,


Grüße
 Thomas


-----------------
Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 
München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas 
Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht 
München, HRB 106955
>From 2271282f127366e785601242a46d4aa668bd6660 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 15:11:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix one issue in OpenMP 'requires' directive diagnostics

Fix-up for recent commit 683f11843974f0bdf42f79cdcbb0c2b43c7b81b0
"OpenMP: Move omp requires checks to libgomp".

	gcc/
	* lto-cgraph.cc (input_offload_tables) <LTO_symtab_edge>: Correct
	'fn2' computation.
	libgomp/
	* testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-1.c: Add 'dg-note's.
	* testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-2.c: Likewise.
	* testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-3.c: Likewise.
	* testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-7.c: Likewise.
	* testsuite/libgomp.fortran/requires-1.f90: Likewise.
---
 gcc/lto-cgraph.cc                                   | 2 +-
 libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-1.c | 4 +++-
 libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-2.c | 4 +++-
 libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-3.c | 4 +++-
 libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-7.c | 7 ++++++-
 libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/requires-1.f90    | 5 +++++
 6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/lto-cgraph.cc b/gcc/lto-cgraph.cc
index 48629651e31..6d9c36ea8b6 100644
--- a/gcc/lto-cgraph.cc
+++ b/gcc/lto-cgraph.cc
@@ -1879,7 +1879,7 @@ input_offload_tables (bool do_force_output)
 			     && TREE_CODE (tmp_decl) != TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL)
 			tmp_decl = DECL_CONTEXT (tmp_decl);
 		      if (tmp_decl != NULL_TREE)
-			fn2 = IDENTIFIER_POINTER (DECL_NAME (requires_decl));
+			fn2 = IDENTIFIER_POINTER (DECL_NAME (tmp_decl));
 		    }
 
 		  char buf1[sizeof ("unified_address, unified_shared_memory, "
diff --git a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-1.c b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-1.c
index ab9a8ddfcde..31996f1ecf6 100644
--- a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-1.c
+++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-1.c
@@ -20,5 +20,7 @@ main (void)
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* { dg-error "OpenMP 'requires' directive with non-identical clauses in multiple compilation units: 'unified_shared_memory' vs. 'unified_address'" "" { target *-*-* } 0 }  */
+/* { dg-error "OpenMP 'requires' directive with non-identical clauses in multiple compilation units: 'unified_shared_memory' vs. 'unified_address'" "" { target *-*-* } 0 }
+     { dg-note {requires-1\.c' has 'unified_shared_memory'} {} { target *-*-* } 0 }
+     { dg-note {requires-1-aux\.c' has 'unified_address'} {} { target *-*-* } 0 } */
 /* { dg-excess-errors "Ignore messages like: errors during merging of translation units|mkoffload returned 1 exit status" } */
diff --git a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-2.c b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-2.c
index be1830d0c46..b20e154b0c7 100644
--- a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-2.c
+++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-2.c
@@ -21,5 +21,7 @@ main (void)
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* { dg-error "OpenMP 'requires' directive with 'unified_shared_memory' specified only in some compilation units" "" { target *-*-* } 0 }  */
+/* { dg-error "OpenMP 'requires' directive with 'unified_shared_memory' specified only in some compilation units" "" { target *-*-* } 0 }
+     { dg-note {requires-2\.c' has 'unified_shared_memory'} {} { target *-*-* } 0 }
+     { dg-note {but '[^']*requires-2-aux\.c' has not} {} { target *-*-* } 0 } */
 /* { dg-excess-errors "Ignore messages like: errors during merging of translation units|mkoffload returned 1 exit status" } */
diff --git a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-3.c b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-3.c
index 1c204c8a21e..a549a19ebbb 100644
--- a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-3.c
+++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-3.c
@@ -20,5 +20,7 @@ main (void)
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* { dg-error "OpenMP 'requires' directive with non-identical clauses in multiple compilation units: 'unified_address, unified_shared_memory' vs. 'unified_address'" "" { target *-*-* } 0 }  */
+/* { dg-error "OpenMP 'requires' directive with non-identical clauses in multiple compilation units: 'unified_address, unified_shared_memory' vs. 'unified_address'" "" { target *-*-* } 0 }
+     { dg-note {requires-3\.c' has 'unified_address, unified_shared_memory'} {} { target *-*-* } 0 }
+     { dg-note {requires-3-aux\.c' has 'unified_address'} {} { target *-*-* } 0 } */
 /* { dg-excess-errors "Ignore messages like: errors during merging of translation units|mkoffload returned 1 exit status" } */
diff --git a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-7.c b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-7.c
index 7473aa62e08..370ed338e4c 100644
--- a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-7.c
+++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-7.c
@@ -20,5 +20,10 @@ main (void)
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* { dg-error "OpenMP 'requires' directive with non-identical clauses in multiple compilation units: 'unified_shared_memory' vs. 'unified_address'" "" { target *-*-* } 0 }  */
+/* { dg-error "OpenMP 'requires' directive with non-identical clauses in multiple compilation units: 'unified_shared_memory' vs. 'unified_address'" "" { target *-*-* } 0 }
+     { dg-note {requires-7\.c' has 'unified_shared_memory'} {} { target *-*-* } 0 }
+     TODO There is some issue that we're not seeing the source file name here (but a temporary '*.o' instead):
+     { dg-note {requires-7-aux\.c' has 'unified_address'} {} { xfail *-*-* } 0 }
+     ..., so verify that at least the rest of the diagnostic is correct:
+     { dg-note {' has 'unified_address'} {} { target *-*-* } 0 } */
 /* { dg-excess-errors "Ignore messages like: errors during merging of translation units|mkoffload returned 1 exit status" } */
diff --git a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/requires-1.f90 b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/requires-1.f90
index e957b1b5918..59211496c33 100644
--- a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/requires-1.f90
+++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/requires-1.f90
@@ -23,4 +23,9 @@ program main
 end
 
 ! { dg-error "OpenMP 'requires' directive with non-identical clauses in multiple compilation units: 'unified_shared_memory' vs. 'unified_address'" "" { target *-*-* } 0 }
+!   { dg-note {requires-1\.f90' has 'unified_shared_memory'} {} { target *-*-* } 0 }
+!   TODO There is some issue that we're not seeing the source file name here (but a temporary '*.o' instead):
+!   { dg-note {requires-1-aux\.f90' has 'unified_address'} {} { xfail *-*-* } 0 }
+!   ..., so verify that at least the rest of the diagnostic is correct:
+!   { dg-note {' has 'unified_address'} {} { target *-*-* } 0 }
 ! { dg-excess-errors "Ignore messages like: errors during merging of translation units|mkoffload returned 1 exit status" }
-- 
2.35.1

Reply via email to