Hi.
As noticed in the PR, I wrongly introduced /= and *= operators.
Problem was that these operators need to modify *this object.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin
PR middle-end/106059
gcc/ChangeLog:
* profile-count.h: *= and /= operators need to modify this
object.
---
gcc/profile-count.h | 20 ++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/profile-count.h b/gcc/profile-count.h
index be6e2d57cf7..141a8827001 100644
--- a/gcc/profile-count.h
+++ b/gcc/profile-count.h
@@ -605,9 +605,10 @@ public:
return apply_scale (num, 1);
}
- profile_probability operator*= (int64_t den) const
+ profile_probability operator*= (int64_t num)
{
- return *this * den;
+ *this = apply_scale (num, 1);
+ return *this;
}
profile_probability operator/ (int64_t den) const
@@ -615,9 +616,10 @@ public:
return apply_scale (1, den);
}
- profile_probability operator/= (int64_t den) const
+ profile_probability operator/= (int64_t den)
{
- return *this / den;
+ *this = apply_scale (1, den);
+ return *this;
}
/* Get the value of the count. */
@@ -1017,9 +1019,10 @@ public:
return apply_scale (num, 1);
}
- profile_count operator*= (int64_t den) const
+ profile_count operator*= (int64_t num)
{
- return *this * den;
+ *this = apply_scale (num, 1);
+ return *this;
}
profile_count operator/ (int64_t den) const
@@ -1027,9 +1030,10 @@ public:
return apply_scale (1, den);
}
- profile_count operator/= (int64_t den) const
+ profile_count operator/= (int64_t den)
{
- return *this / den;
+ *this = apply_scale (1, den);
+ return *this;
}
/* Return true when value is not zero and can be used for scaling.
--
2.36.1