thank you to the reviewers of the patch sets 01 though 09. As a brief followup/summary I propose rewriting linking as per Richard's suggestion:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-May/595782.html Aside from the many technical advantages, logistically it also means: * the gm2 driver code becomes similar to existing front end drivers. * allowing the next set of patches to be smaller and easier to review. [The driver will be posted separate to the gimple interface] Would it be ok to open up a short term branch devel/m2link to accomodate these disruptive code changes, or would a private branch be more appropriate? Currently the runtime changes have been completed. regards, Gaius
