On Thu, 2022-06-02 at 23:09 -0400, Antoni Boucher via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> Hi.
> The attached patch fix bug 105829:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105829
> 
> Thanks for the review.

> diff --git a/gcc/jit/libgccjit.cc b/gcc/jit/libgccjit.cc
> index cc6486c9cad..12e7679988b 100644
> --- a/gcc/jit/libgccjit.cc
> +++ b/gcc/jit/libgccjit.cc
> @@ -545,8 +545,8 @@ gcc_jit_type_get_size (gcc_jit_type *type)
>  {
>    RETURN_VAL_IF_FAIL (type, -1, NULL, NULL, "NULL type");
>    RETURN_VAL_IF_FAIL
> -    (type->is_int (), -1, NULL, NULL,
> -     "only getting the size of an integer type is supported for now");
> +    (type->is_int () || type->is_float (), -1, NULL, NULL,
> +     "only getting the size of an int or float type is supported for now");

Reword to:

  "only getting the size of integer or floating-point types is supported for 
now"

to avoid using the words "int" and "float" to refer to those kinds of
types, and to follow:
  https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#Spelling

>    return type->get_size ();
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-types.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-types.c
> index 6836597d14e..53bdeafed61 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-types.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-types.c
> @@ -489,4 +489,7 @@ verify_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, gcc_jit_result 
> *result)
>      CHECK (gcc_jit_compatible_types (
>        gcc_jit_context_get_type (ctxt, GCC_JIT_TYPE_LONG),
>        gcc_jit_context_get_type (ctxt, GCC_JIT_TYPE_INT64_T)));
> +
> +  CHECK_VALUE (gcc_jit_type_get_size (gcc_jit_context_get_type (ctxt, 
> GCC_JIT_TYPE_FLOAT)), 4);
> +  CHECK_VALUE (gcc_jit_type_get_size (gcc_jit_context_get_type (ctxt, 
> GCC_JIT_TYPE_DOUBLE)), 8);

I'm not sure these sizes are 4 and 8 on every target we support.  I got
curious and found e.g. gcc/config/rl78/rl78.h has:

#define FLOAT_TYPE_SIZE                 32
#define DOUBLE_TYPE_SIZE                32 /*64*/

Maybe use sizeof (float) and sizeof (double) in the assertion, rather
than hardcoding the values? (though this still assumes host == target).

Otherwise LGTM - OK for trunk with those nits fixed.

Thanks
Dave


Reply via email to