On Tue, 24 May 2022 at 11:50, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> When facing multiple PHI defs and one feeding the other we can
> postpone processing uses of one and thus can proceed.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed.
>
> 2022-05-20  Richard Biener  <rguent...@suse.de>
>
>         PR tree-optimization/100221
>         * tree-ssa-dse.cc (contains_phi_arg): New function.
>         (dse_classify_store): Postpone PHI defs that feed another PHI in defs.
>
>         * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-44.c: New testcase.
>         * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-45.c: Likewise.
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-44.c | 19 +++++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-45.c | 24 +++++++++++
>  gcc/tree-ssa-dse.cc                        | 46 +++++++++++++++++++---
>  3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-44.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-45.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-44.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-44.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..aaec41d7bdf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-44.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +/* { dg-do link } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O -fdump-tree-dse1-details" } */
> +
> +extern void foo(void);
> +int a, b;
> +static int c;
> +int main()
> +{
> +  if (c)
> +    foo ();
> +  int *g = &c;
> +  int **h = &g;
> +  int ***h1 = &h;
> +  if (a)
> +    while (b)
> +      b = 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Deleted dead store: g = &c;" "dse1" } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-45.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-45.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..fd92d7b599a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-45.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +/* { dg-do link } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O" } */
> +
> +extern void foo(void);
> +int a, b;
> +static int c;
> +static void f() {
> +  while (a)
> +    for (; b; b--)
> +      ;
> +}
> +void i() {
> +  if (c)
> +    foo();
> +  int *g = &c;
> +  {
> +    int **h[1] = {&g};
> +    f();
> +  }
> +}
> +int main() {
> +  i();
> +  return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-dse.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-dse.cc
> index 881a2d0f98d..ea50de789b1 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-dse.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-dse.cc
> @@ -898,6 +898,17 @@ dse_optimize_redundant_stores (gimple *stmt)
>      }
>  }
>
> +/* Return whether PHI contains ARG as an argument.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +contains_phi_arg (gphi *phi, tree arg)
> +{
> +  for (unsigned i = 0; i < gimple_phi_num_args (phi); ++i)
> +    if (gimple_phi_arg_def (phi, i) == arg)
> +      return true;
> +  return false;
> +}
Hi Richard,
Just wondering if contains_phi_arg could be a more general purpose
utility function, and moved to gimple.cc
or tree-ssa.cc than be specific to tree-ssa-dse.cc ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
> +
>  /* A helper of dse_optimize_stmt.
>     Given a GIMPLE_ASSIGN in STMT that writes to REF, classify it
>     according to downstream uses and defs.  Sets *BY_CLOBBER_P to true
> @@ -949,8 +960,8 @@ dse_classify_store (ao_ref *ref, gimple *stmt,
>         return DSE_STORE_LIVE;
>
>        auto_vec<gimple *, 10> defs;
> -      gimple *first_phi_def = NULL;
> -      gimple *last_phi_def = NULL;
> +      gphi *first_phi_def = NULL;
> +      gphi *last_phi_def = NULL;
>        FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT (use_stmt, ui, defvar)
>         {
>           /* Limit stmt walking.  */
> @@ -973,8 +984,8 @@ dse_classify_store (ao_ref *ref, gimple *stmt,
>                 {
>                   defs.safe_push (use_stmt);
>                   if (!first_phi_def)
> -                   first_phi_def = use_stmt;
> -                 last_phi_def = use_stmt;
> +                   first_phi_def = as_a <gphi *> (use_stmt);
> +                 last_phi_def = as_a <gphi *> (use_stmt);
>                 }
>             }
>           /* If the statement is a use the store is not dead.  */
> @@ -1046,6 +1057,7 @@ dse_classify_store (ao_ref *ref, gimple *stmt,
>           use_operand_p use_p;
>           tree vdef = (gimple_code (def) == GIMPLE_PHI
>                        ? gimple_phi_result (def) : gimple_vdef (def));
> +         gphi *phi_def;
>           /* If the path to check starts with a kill we do not need to
>              process it further.
>              ???  With byte tracking we need only kill the bytes currently
> @@ -1079,7 +1091,31 @@ dse_classify_store (ao_ref *ref, gimple *stmt,
>                            && bitmap_bit_p (visited,
>                                             SSA_NAME_VERSION
>                                               (PHI_RESULT (use_stmt))))))
> -           defs.unordered_remove (i);
> +           {
> +             defs.unordered_remove (i);
> +             if (def == first_phi_def)
> +               first_phi_def = NULL;
> +             else if (def == last_phi_def)
> +               last_phi_def = NULL;
> +           }
> +         /* If def is a PHI and one of its arguments is another PHI node 
> still
> +            in consideration we can defer processing it.  */
> +         else if ((phi_def = dyn_cast <gphi *> (def))
> +                  && ((last_phi_def
> +                       && phi_def != last_phi_def
> +                       && contains_phi_arg (phi_def,
> +                                            gimple_phi_result 
> (last_phi_def)))
> +                      || (first_phi_def
> +                          && phi_def != first_phi_def
> +                          && contains_phi_arg
> +                               (phi_def, gimple_phi_result 
> (first_phi_def)))))
> +           {
> +             defs.unordered_remove (i);
> +             if (phi_def == first_phi_def)
> +               first_phi_def = NULL;
> +             else if (phi_def == last_phi_def)
> +               last_phi_def = NULL;
> +           }
>           else
>             ++i;
>         }
> --
> 2.35.3

Reply via email to