Hi, The attached patch adjusts vec_perm_const hook to accommodate the new parameter. For rationale, please see: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-May/595128.html
Unfortunately, I am not sure how to cross test this patch. make all-gcc stage-1 seems to build fine. Is it OK to commit the patch ? Thanks, Prathamesh
diff --git a/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc b/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc index 45bbb6c3d70..e46566c526c 100644 --- a/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc +++ b/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc @@ -17175,9 +17175,12 @@ vectorize_vec_perm_const_1 (const struct expand_vec_perm_d &d) hook is supposed to emit the required INSNs. */ bool -s390_vectorize_vec_perm_const (machine_mode vmode, rtx target, rtx op0, rtx op1, - const vec_perm_indices &sel) +s390_vectorize_vec_perm_const (machine_mode vmode, machine_mode op_mode, rtx target, + rtx op0, rtx op1, const vec_perm_indices &sel) { + if (vmode != op_mode) + return false; + struct expand_vec_perm_d d; unsigned int i, nelt;