[Ada] Prevent overflow in computation of aggregate size

[Pierre-Marie de Rodat via Gcc-patches]

When computing size of a static aggregate to decide if it should be
transformed into assignments and loops we could have an overflow check.
This is mostly harmless, because colossal aggregates will likely crash
the application anyway, no matter how we transform them.

This was not detected because compiler was built with -gnatg switch that
suppresses overflow checks (they are only enabled by an explicit -gnato
switch).

Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk

gcc/ada/

        * exp_aggr.adb (Component_Count): Calculate size as an Uint and
        only then check if it is in the range of Int, as otherwise the
        multiplication of Int values can overflow.
diff --git a/gcc/ada/exp_aggr.adb b/gcc/ada/exp_aggr.adb
--- a/gcc/ada/exp_aggr.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/exp_aggr.adb
@@ -661,10 +661,10 @@ package body Exp_Aggr is
 
                   declare
                      UI : constant Uint :=
-                            Expr_Value (Hi) - Expr_Value (Lo) + 1;
+                            (Expr_Value (Hi) - Expr_Value (Lo) + 1) * Siz;
                   begin
                      if UI_Is_In_Int_Range (UI) then
-                        return Siz * UI_To_Int (UI);
+                        return UI_To_Int (UI);
                      else
                         return Int'Last;
                      end if;