Hi!
When looking at the kernel __popcountdi2 issue, I've noticed a comment typo.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk
as obvious.
2022-04-13 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
* tree-scalar-evolution.cc (expression_expensive_p): Fix a comment typo.
--- gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc.jj 2022-01-18 11:58:59.991976213 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.cc 2022-04-13 08:10:25.291670331 +0200
@@ -3395,7 +3395,7 @@ expression_expensive_p (tree expr, hash_
call_expr_arg_iterator iter;
/* Even though is_inexpensive_builtin might say true, we will get a
library call for popcount when backend does not have an instruction
- to do so. We consider this to be expenseive and generate
+ to do so. We consider this to be expensive and generate
__builtin_popcount only when backend defines it. */
combined_fn cfn = get_call_combined_fn (expr);
switch (cfn)
Jakub
