On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:02:06AM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote: > on 2022/4/11 11:42 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 04:29:40PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote: > >> Nice, I confirmed this makes ICE gone, I've filed one new PR > >> PR105213 for GCC13 further tracking by associating this patch there. > > > > Cool, I'll commit it later today then (after a final regstrap). The > > _nodm pattern just missed the alternative for no FP regs (the _dm > > pattern has it, so just an oversight). > > Thanks! So it can be counted as a regression fix instead of tiny > feature work? Maybe we also need bif documentation change, and > gcc12 changes html update (as bif behavior changes), or it's > too small so no?
It is just a bugfix. Everything in anything that is not a new feature is arguably a regression fix, so that classification isn't useful normally. I'd rather fix more bugs than do more filing work ;-) The documentation already has this under "The following built-in functions are also available on all PowerPC processors:", so no doc changes are needed either: this is a bugfix! :-) Segher
