On 08/04/2022 09:28, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
> On 07/04/2022 18:53, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> Hello Jørgen,
>>
>> there could be an issue with conditions in for loops:
>>
>> 3: 189: for (int a = 0; a <= 1; ++a) {
>> branch 0 taken 2
>> branch 1 taken 1 (fallthrough)
>> conditions covered 0/2
>> condition 0 not covered (true)
>> condition 0 not covered (false)
>>
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks, I'll have a look at it. There should be a for loop in the test suite,
> but I'll add this exact example and see if I can reproduce it. This should
> obviously be 100% covered.
Sebastian,
I added this exact example to the test suite, but it reports 2/2 for me (linux
amd64). Do you have a very different system, and what flags did you use?
Cheers,
Jørgen
