On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 7:03 AM Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 06:49:01AM -0700, H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches wrote: > > gcc/ > > > > PR target/104890 > > * config/i386/i386.cc (ix86_can_inline_p): Ignore > > OPTION_MASK_ISA_64BIT for -m32. > > > > gcc/testsuite/ > > > > PR target/104890 > > * gcc.target/i386/pr104890.c: New test. > > --- > > gcc/config/i386/i386.cc | 4 ++++ > > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr104890.c | 11 +++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr104890.c > > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc > > index 23bedea92bd..f2bb4765e5b 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc > > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc > > @@ -587,6 +587,10 @@ ix86_can_inline_p (tree caller, tree callee) > > if (TARGET_GENERAL_REGS_ONLY_P (callee_opts->x_ix86_target_flags)) > > always_inline_safe_mask |= MASK_80387; > > > > + /* Ignore OPTION_MASK_ISA_64BIT for -m32. */ > > + if (!TARGET_64BIT) > > + always_inline_safe_mask |= OPTION_MASK_ISA_64BIT; > > This looks wrong. (1 << 1) in alwyas_inline_safe_mask and > *->x_target_flags is MASK_80387, not OPTION_MASK_ISA_64BIT. > > Jakub
Here is the v2 patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-March/591716.html -- H.J.
