On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 15:12, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 14:28, Detlef Vollmann wrote: > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > On 3/10/22 22:11, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > > Tested x86_64-linux, pushed to trunk. > > > > Thanks. > > With this and the other fix I was able to build the complete > > libstdc++ for AVR based on AVR Libc 2.0 (plus some ad hoc > > AVR header fixes) from git master 5e28be89. > > Nice. I finally figure out that I need to use --enable-libstdcxx *not* > --enable-libstdc++-v3 to build for AVR, and now I get errors due to > EOVERFLOW being undefined. Is that what you fixed? > > We should make that work. Arguably, all values of std::errc should > exist, even if the OS <errno.h> doesn't provide a constant. We could > define the missing ones ourselves, choosing numbers > 1000 (and hope > the OS uses small numbers for its own errno values).
I opened https://gcc.gnu.org/PR104883 for this. > > > > > And a small example with pmr::string and pmr::vector worked :-) > > Great!
