On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 08:28, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>
> There doesn't seem to be any reason for this TU to include
> <iostream>, and it causes errors when the resulting libstdc++ is used
> on our VxWorks 5.5 target - presumably because now libstdc++ itself
> contains an instance of std::ios_base::Init. Which should be mostly
> harmless, but apparently isn't, and from a QoI viewpoint should
> probably be avoided anyway.

100% agreed, thanks.


> ---
>  libstdc++-v3/config/locale/vxworks/ctype_members.cc | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/config/locale/vxworks/ctype_members.cc 
> b/libstdc++-v3/config/locale/vxworks/ctype_members.cc
> index 82569d075c6..d8ca551078d 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/config/locale/vxworks/ctype_members.cc
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/config/locale/vxworks/ctype_members.cc
> @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
>  #include <cstdlib>
>  #include <cstring>
>  #include <cstdio>
> -#include <iostream>
>
>  namespace std _GLIBCXX_VISIBILITY(default)
>  {
> --
> 2.31.1
>

Reply via email to