> Am 01.03.2022 um 04:27 schrieb H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches 
> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>:
> 
> commit a5883ba0de68efad36db145e75c86394d8bd44ea
> Author: Michael Matz <m...@gcc.gnu.org>
> Date:   Tue Nov 24 15:37:32 2009 +0000
> 
> introduced currently_expanding_gimple_stmt, which was set and cleared in
> expand_gimple_basic_block when expanding gimple statement to RTL.  But it
> isn't cleared when expand_gimple_basic_block returns inside the loop.

Ok 

Richard 


> 
>    PR middle-end/104721
>    * cfgexpand.cc (expand_gimple_basic_block): Clear
>    currently_expanding_gimple_stmt when returning inside the loop.
> ---
> gcc/cfgexpand.cc | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/cfgexpand.cc b/gcc/cfgexpand.cc
> index d51af2e3084..87536ec7ccd 100644
> --- a/gcc/cfgexpand.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cfgexpand.cc
> @@ -5927,7 +5927,10 @@ expand_gimple_basic_block (basic_block bb, bool 
> disable_tail_calls)
>    {
>      new_bb = expand_gimple_cond (bb, as_a <gcond *> (stmt));
>      if (new_bb)
> -        return new_bb;
> +        {
> +          currently_expanding_gimple_stmt = NULL;
> +          return new_bb;
> +        }
>    }
>       else if (is_gimple_debug (stmt))
>    {
> @@ -6049,7 +6052,10 @@ expand_gimple_basic_block (basic_block bb, bool 
> disable_tail_calls)
>          if (can_fallthru)
>            bb = new_bb;
>          else
> -            return new_bb;
> +            {
> +              currently_expanding_gimple_stmt = NULL;
> +              return new_bb;
> +            }
>        }
>        }
>      else
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 

Reply via email to