On 2/8/22 15:11, Qing Zhao wrote:
Hi,

This is the patch to fix PR101515 (ICE in pp_cxx_unqualified_id, at  
cp/cxx-pretty-print.c:128)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101515

It's possible that the TYPE_NAME of a record_type is NULL, therefore when
printing the TYPE_NAME, we should check and handle this special case.

Please see the comment of pr101515 for more details.

The fix is very simple, just check and special handle cases when TYPE_NAME is 
NULL.

Bootstrapped and regression tested on both x86 and aarch64, no issues.

Okay for commit?

Thanks.

Qing

=====================================

 From f37ee8d21b80cb77d8108cb97a487c84c530545b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qing Zhao <qing.z...@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 16:10:37 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fix PR 101515 ICE in pp_cxx_unqualified_id, at
  cp/cxx-pretty-print.c:128.

It's possible that the TYPE_NAME of a record_type is NULL, therefore when
printing the TYPE_NAME, we should check and handle this special case.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * cxx-pretty-print.cc (pp_cxx_unqualified_id): Check and handle
        the case when TYPE_NAME is NULL.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.dg/pr101515.C: New test.
---
  gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.cc      |  5 ++++-
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr101515.C | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr101515.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.cc b/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.cc
index 4f9a090e520d..744ed0add5ba 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.cc
@@ -171,7 +171,10 @@ pp_cxx_unqualified_id (cxx_pretty_printer *pp, tree t)
      case ENUMERAL_TYPE:
      case TYPENAME_TYPE:
      case UNBOUND_CLASS_TEMPLATE:
-      pp_cxx_unqualified_id (pp, TYPE_NAME (t));
+      if (TYPE_NAME (t))
+       pp_cxx_unqualified_id (pp, TYPE_NAME (t));
+      else
+       pp_string (pp, "<unnamed type>");

Hmm, but it's not an unnamed class, it's a pointer to member function type, and it would be better to avoid dumping compiler internal representations like the __pfn field name.

I think the real problem comes sooner, when c_fold_indirect_ref_for_warn turns a MEM_REF with RECORD_TYPE into a COMPONENT_REF with POINTER_TYPE.

        if (tree ti = TYPE_TEMPLATE_INFO_MAYBE_ALIAS (t))
        if (PRIMARY_TEMPLATE_P (TI_TEMPLATE (ti)))
          {
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr101515.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr101515.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..898c7e003c22
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr101515.C
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+/* PR101515 -  ICE in pp_cxx_unqualified_id, at cp/cxx-pretty-print.c:128
+   { dg-do compile }
+   { dg-options "-Wuninitialized -O1" } */
+
+struct S
+{
+  int j;
+};
+struct T : public S
+{
+  virtual void h () {}
+};
+struct ptrmemfunc
+{
+  void (*ptr) ();
+};
+typedef void (S::*sp)();
+int main ()
+{
+  T t;
+  sp x;
+  ptrmemfunc *xp = (ptrmemfunc *) &x;
+  if (xp->ptr != ((void (*)())(sizeof(void *))))  /* { dg-warning "is used 
uninitialized" } */
+    return 1;
+}

Reply via email to