On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 10:32:21AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I've just noticed the patch broke a few cross compilers:
>
> s390x-ibm-tpf:
>
> /home/marxin/buildworker/zen2-cross-compilers/build/gcc/common/config/s390/s390-common.cc:
> In function ‘bool s390_supports_split_stack(bool, gcc_options*)’:
> /home/marxin/buildworker/zen2-cross-compilers/build/gcc/common/config/s390/s390-common.cc:126:13:
> error: ‘struct gcc_options’ has no member named ‘x_linux_libc’
> 126 | if (opts->x_linux_libc == LIBC_GLIBC)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> i686-kopensolaris-gnu, i686-symbolics-gnu
>
> /home/marxin/buildworker/zen2-cross-compilers/build/gcc/common/config/i386/i386-common.cc:
> In function ‘bool ix86_supports_split_stack(bool, gcc_options*)’:
> /home/marxin/buildworker/zen2-cross-compilers/build/gcc/common/config/i386/i386-common.cc:1721:13:
> error: ‘struct gcc_options’ has no member named ‘x_linux_libc’
> 1721 | if (opts->x_linux_libc != LIBC_GLIBC)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:2418: i386-common.o] Error 1
>
> Can you please take a look? Btw. do you have a bugzilla account?
I bet instead of opts->x_linux_libc != LIBC_GLIBC it needs to use
#ifdef OPTION_GLIBC
if (!OPTION_GLIBC)
#endif
or so. I think the first committed patch actually used that
but used it in #if directive, which is wrong because it is something
that needs to be evaluated at runtime.
Jakub
