> Am 19.01.2022 um 00:50 schrieb Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>: > > Hi! > > This is a non-C++ related part from the PR89074 address_compare changes. > For "foo" == "foo" we already optimize this from the (cmp @0 @0) > simplification, because we use operand_equal_p in that case > and operand_equal_p also compares the STRING_CSTs bytes rather than > just addresses. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? Ok. Thanks, Richard > 2022-01-18 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> > > PR c++/89074 > * fold-const.cc (address_compare): Consider different STRING_CSTs > with the same lengths that memcmp the same as equal, not different. > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr89074.c: New test. > > --- gcc/fold-const.cc.jj 2022-01-18 13:25:08.057491249 +0100 > +++ gcc/fold-const.cc 2022-01-18 13:53:26.106261913 +0100 > @@ -16587,6 +16587,15 @@ address_compare (tree_code code, tree ty > || TREE_CODE (base1) == SSA_NAME > || TREE_CODE (base1) == STRING_CST)) > equal = (base0 == base1); > + /* Assume different STRING_CSTs with the same content will be > + merged. */ > + if (equal == 0 > + && TREE_CODE (base0) == STRING_CST > + && TREE_CODE (base1) == STRING_CST > + && TREE_STRING_LENGTH (base0) == TREE_STRING_LENGTH (base1) > + && memcmp (TREE_STRING_POINTER (base0), TREE_STRING_POINTER (base1), > + TREE_STRING_LENGTH (base0)) == 0) > + equal = 1; > if (equal == 1) > { > if (code == EQ_EXPR > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr89074.c.jj 2022-01-18 > 18:42:05.125004996 +0100 > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr89074.c 2022-01-18 18:43:39.249694890 > +0100 > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ > +/* PR c++/89074 */ > +/* { dg-do compile } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "return 1;" "optimized" } } */ > + > +int > +foo (void) > +{ > + const char *a = &"foo"[0]; > + const char *b = "foo"; > + return a == b; > +} > > Jakub >
Re: [PATCH] fold-const: Optimize &"foo"[0] == "foo" [PR89074]
Richard Biener via Gcc-patches Tue, 18 Jan 2022 22:28:18 -0800
- [PATCH] fold-const: Optimize &"foo... Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH] fold-const: Optimize &... Richard Biener via Gcc-patches