In g:526e1639aa76b0a8496b0dc3a3ff2c450229544e I'd added support
for finding more consecutive MEMs.  However, the check was too
eager, in that it matched MEM_REFs with the same base address
even if that base address was an arbitrary SSA name.  This can
give wrong results if a MEM_REF from one loop iteration is
compared with a MEM_REF from another (e.g. after rtl unrolling).

In principle, we could still accept MEM_REFs based on the same
incoming SSA name, but there seems to be no out-of-the-box API
for doing that.  Adding a new one at this stage in GCC 12 doesn't
feel like a good risk/reward trade-off.

This patch therefore restricts the MEM_EXPR comparison to base decls
only, excluding all MEM_REFs.  It means we lose all the new STPs in
the PR testcase but keep the ones in the original stp_1.c testcase.

Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu and pushed.

Richard


gcc/
        PR target/104005
        * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_check_consecutive_mems):
        When using MEM_EXPR, require the base to be a decl.

gcc/testsuite/
        PR target/104005
        * gcc.target/aarch64/pr104005.c: New test.
---
 gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc               |  1 +
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr104005.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr104005.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
index fdf0c9bd5b8..296145e6008 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
@@ -24747,6 +24747,7 @@ aarch64_check_consecutive_mems (rtx *mem1, rtx *mem2, 
bool *reversed)
                                                       &expr_offset2);
       if (!expr_base1
          || !expr_base2
+         || !DECL_P (expr_base1)
          || !operand_equal_p (expr_base1, expr_base2, OEP_ADDRESS_OF))
        return false;
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr104005.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr104005.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..09dd81910eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr104005.c
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -funroll-loops" } */
+
+typedef int v2 __attribute__((vector_size(8)));
+
+void f(void) {
+  v2 v[1024];
+  v2 *ptr = v;
+  for (int i = 0; i < 512; ++i)
+    {
+      ptr[0][0] = 0;
+      asm volatile ("":::"memory");
+      ptr[0][1] = 1;
+      ptr += 2;
+    }
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\tstp\t} } } */
-- 
2.25.1

Reply via email to