On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Michael Matz wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Richard Guenther wrote: > > > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr31261.c scan-tree-dump-times original "return > > \\(char\\) > > -\\(unsigned char\\) c & 31;" 1 > > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr31261.c scan-tree-dump-times original "return > > \\(int\\) > > \\(12 - \\(unsigned int\\) d\\) & 7;" 1 > > > > because we dump the unsigned type variant differently now. What do > > people think - adjust the testcase? Adjust how we pretty-print > > these non-standard integer types? > > Adjusting the pretty printer would be nice anyway. Those <unnamed>:35 > thingies hurt my eyes. Just printing int17 or uint18 would be perfectly > fine, with special casing of sizes that match the normal C types for > the target in question (so that input 'unsigned char' isn't converted to > 'uint8' on one and 'uint16' on another target).
Ok, I'll do that (special-casing some precisions via *_TYPE_SIZE). I won't touch the <unnamed-unsigned-type:35> stuff, for now. Richard.
