Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com> writes:
> this test adjust some test for mingw targets.
would you please fix you mailer not to break long lines? It makes
reviewing harder.
> Index: gcc.dg/vect/pr46126.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc.dg/vect/pr46126.c (revision 184657)
> +++ gcc.dg/vect/pr46126.c (working copy)
> @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
> /* { dg-do compile } */
>
> +__extension__ typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
I think you should use __UINTPTR_TYPE__/uintptr_t instead.
> Index: gcc.dg/format/dfp-scanf-1.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc.dg/format/dfp-scanf-1.c (revision 184657)
> +++ gcc.dg/format/dfp-scanf-1.c (working copy)
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> /* { dg-require-effective-target dfp } */
> /* { dg-options "-Wformat" } */
> -/* { dg-skip-if "No scanf/printf dfp support" { *-*-mingw* } } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "No scanf/printf dfp support" { *-*-mingw* } { "*" }
> { "" } } */
What's the point of this change? Why are you explicitly adding the
defaults?
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
