On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 01:06:58PM -0400, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
Not a review, just a few nits:
I think it would be useful to clarify that -Wno-attributes=list doesn't
actually imply -Wno-attributes
> --- a/gcc/common.opt
> +++ b/gcc/common.opt
> @@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ void *flag_instrument_functions_exclude_functions
> Variable
> void *flag_instrument_functions_exclude_files
>
> +Variable
> +void *flag_ignored_attributes
> +
> ; Generic structs (e.g. templates not explicitly specialized)
> ; may not have a compilation unit associated with them, and so
> ; may need to be treated differently from ordinary structs.
> @@ -546,6 +549,10 @@ Wattributes
> Common Var(warn_attributes) Init(1) Warning
> Warn about inappropriate attribute usage.
>
> +Wattributes=
> +Common Joined
> +Do not warn about specified attributes.
> +
So, wouldn't be this better specified as
Wno-attributes=
Common Joined RejectNegative
(not sure if RejectNegative is actually needed for an option
starting with Wno- )?
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-std=c++11" { target c++ } } */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-Wno-attributes=company::,yoyodyne::attr" } */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-Wno-attributes=c1::attr,c1::attr,c1::__attr__"
> } */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-Wno-attributes=clang" } */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-Wno-attributes=c2::,c2::attr" } */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-Wno-attributes=c3::attr,c3::" } */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-Wno-attributes=x::," } */
Should the above be accepted (I mean trailing , ?) What does that mean?
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-Wno-attributes=yoyodyne::attr_new" } */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-Wno-attributes=c4::__attr__" } */
When writing __attr__, does that imply we won't warn about both
c4::attr and c4::__attr__ (and __c4__::attr and __c4__::__attr__) like
it would when writing -Wno-attributes=c4::attr ?
Jakub
