On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 12:46 AM Thomas Schwinge
<tho...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew!
>
> First, I appreciate you working through all these old PRs!
>
>
> On 2021-09-15T13:56:37-0700, apinski--- via Gcc-patches 
> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > The error message is obvious -funconfigured-libstdc++-v3 is used
> > on the g++ command line.  So we just add the dependancy.
>
> > --- a/Makefile.def
> > +++ b/Makefile.def
> > @@ -592,6 +592,7 @@ dependencies = { module=configure-target-fastjar; 
> > on=configure-target-zlib; };
> >  dependencies = { module=all-target-fastjar; on=all-target-zlib; };
> >  dependencies = { module=configure-target-libgo; 
> > on=configure-target-libffi; };
> >  dependencies = { module=configure-target-libgo; 
> > on=all-target-libstdc++-v3; };
> > +dependencies = { module=configure-target-libffi; 
> > on=all-target-libstdc++-v3; };
> >  dependencies = { module=all-target-libgo; on=all-target-libbacktrace; };
> >  dependencies = { module=all-target-libgo; on=all-target-libffi; };
> >  dependencies = { module=all-target-libgo; on=all-target-libatomic; };
>
> I'm confused, because given that this 'Makefile.def' change only has the
> following effect:
>
> > --- a/Makefile.in
> > +++ b/Makefile.in
> > @@ -61261,6 +61261,7 @@ all-bison: maybe-all-intl
> >  all-flex: maybe-all-intl
> >  all-m4: maybe-all-intl
> >  configure-target-libgo: maybe-all-target-libstdc++-v3
> > +configure-target-libffi: maybe-all-target-libstdc++-v3
> >  configure-target-liboffloadmic: maybe-configure-target-libgomp
> >  all-target-liboffloadmic: maybe-all-target-libgomp
> >  configure-target-newlib: maybe-all-binutils
>
> ... isn't that actually a no-op, because we already had such a dependency
> listed?  Now twice:
>
>     $ grep -n -F 'configure-target-libffi: maybe-all-target-libstdc++-v3' -- 
> Makefile.in
>     61264:configure-target-libffi: maybe-all-target-libstdc++-v3
>     61372:configure-target-libffi: maybe-all-target-libstdc++-v3
>
> Compared to the existing one, the one you've added is additionally
> restricted by '@unless gcc-bootstrap'.
>
> I noticed this as I remembered that on our og[...] development branches
> we have a patch in the opposite direction: get rid of this dependency via
> removing 'lang_env_dependencies = { module=libffi; cxx=true; };' from
> 'Makefile.def'.  See
> <http://mid.mail-archive.com/alpine.DEB.2.21.9999.1812201344250.99920@build7-trusty-cs.sje.mentorg.com>
> "Disable libstdc++ dependency for libffi".  (Maciej CCed in case you have
> any further thoughts on that.)

Oh, I see what happened now, the old bug was actually fixed by r6-5415
which added cxx=true.
So yes my patch is actually not needed and can be reverted.
I tried to look to see if there was a dependency was there but for
some reason I did not see it.
Also it looks like the OpenACC changes never went to the trunk either ....

>
>
> Grüße
>  Thomas
> -----------------
> Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 
> München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas 
> Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht 
> München, HRB 106955

Reply via email to