On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 7:25 PM Indu Bhagat <indu.bha...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/24/21 12:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:18 PM Indu Bhagat via Gcc-patches
> > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> What is the expected DWARF for extern variable in the following cases? I
> >> am seeing that the DWARF generated is different with gcc8.4.1 vs gcc-trunk.
> >>
> >>
> >> Testcase 2
> >> ----------
> >> extern const char a[];
> >> const char a[] = "testme";
> >>
> >> Testcase 2 Behavior
> >> --------------------
> >> - Both gcc-trunk and gcc8.4.1 generate two DW_TAG_variable DIEs (the
> >> defining decl holds the reference to the non-defining decl via
> >> DW_AT_specification)
> >> - But gcc8.4.1 does not generate any DWARF for the type of the defining
> >> decl (const char[7]) but gcc-trunk does.
> >>
> >> ## DWARF for testcase 2 with gcc-trunk is as follows:
> >> <...>
> >>    <1><22>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_array_type)
> >>       <23>   DW_AT_type        : <0x39>
> >>       <27>   DW_AT_sibling     : <0x2d>
> >>    <2><2b>: Abbrev Number: 5 (DW_TAG_subrange_type)
> >>    <2><2c>: Abbrev Number: 0
> >>    <1><2d>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_const_type)
> >>       <2e>   DW_AT_type        : <0x22>
> >>    <1><32>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_base_type)
> >>       <33>   DW_AT_byte_size   : 1
> >>       <34>   DW_AT_encoding    : 6        (signed char)
> >>       <35>   DW_AT_name        : (indirect string, offset: 0x2035): char
> >>    <1><39>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_const_type)
> >>       <3a>   DW_AT_type        : <0x32>
> >>    <1><3e>: Abbrev Number: 6 (DW_TAG_variable)
> >>       <3f>   DW_AT_name        : a
> >>       <41>   DW_AT_decl_file   : 1
> >>       <42>   DW_AT_decl_line   : 1
> >>       <43>   DW_AT_decl_column : 19
> >>       <44>   DW_AT_type        : <0x2d>
> >>       <48>   DW_AT_external    : 1
> >>       <48>   DW_AT_declaration : 1
> >>    <1><48>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_array_type)
> >>       <49>   DW_AT_type        : <0x39>
> >>       <4d>   DW_AT_sibling     : <0x58>
> >>    <2><51>: Abbrev Number: 7 (DW_TAG_subrange_type)
> >>       <52>   DW_AT_type        : <0x5d>
> >>       <56>   DW_AT_upper_bound : 6
> >>    <2><57>: Abbrev Number: 0
> >>    <1><58>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_const_type)
> >>       <59>   DW_AT_type        : <0x48>
> >>    <1><5d>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_base_type)
> >>       <5e>   DW_AT_byte_size   : 8
> >>       <5f>   DW_AT_encoding    : 7        (unsigned)
> >>       <60>   DW_AT_name        : (indirect string, offset: 0x2023): long
> >> unsigned int
> >>    <1><64>: Abbrev Number: 8 (DW_TAG_variable)
> >>       <65>   DW_AT_specification: <0x3e>
> >>       <69>   DW_AT_decl_line   : 2
> >>       <6a>   DW_AT_decl_column : 12
> >>       <6b>   DW_AT_type        : <0x58>
> >
> > I suppose having both a DW_AT_specification and a DW_AT_type
> > is somewhat at odds.  It's likely because the definition specifies
> > the size of the array while the specification does not.  Not sure
> > what should be best done here.
> >
> > Richard.
>
> Hmm..I thought the generated DWARF by gcc-trunk for testcase 2 is
> coherent and specifies the information in alignment with the source :
> DW_AT_type of the defining declaration correctly specifies the type to
> be const char[7] while the DW_AT_specification pointing to the
> non-defining decl (and with type const char[] with no size info).
>
> The DWARF generated by gcc-8.4.1, however, does seem to be missing
> information though. It should have the information for the defining decl
> and hence, the size info. i.e., DW_AT_type pointing to a array with
> DW_TAG_subrange_type with attribute DW_AT_upper_bound = 6 like above.
> Isn't it ?

Yes.

> Indu
>
> >
> >>       <6f>   DW_AT_location    : 9 byte block: 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> >> (DW_OP_addr: 0)
> >>    <1><79>: Abbrev Number: 0
> >>
> >> ## DWARF for testcase 2 with gcc8.4.1 is as follows:
> >>    <1><21>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_array_type)
> >>       <22>   DW_AT_type        : <0x38>
> >>       <26>   DW_AT_sibling     : <0x2c>
> >>    <2><2a>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_subrange_type)
> >>    <2><2b>: Abbrev Number: 0
> >>    <1><2c>: Abbrev Number: 4 (DW_TAG_const_type)
> >>       <2d>   DW_AT_type        : <0x21>
> >>    <1><31>: Abbrev Number: 5 (DW_TAG_base_type)
> >>       <32>   DW_AT_byte_size   : 1
> >>       <33>   DW_AT_encoding    : 6        (signed char)
> >>       <34>   DW_AT_name        : (indirect string, offset: 0x1e04): char
> >>    <1><38>: Abbrev Number: 4 (DW_TAG_const_type)
> >>       <39>   DW_AT_type        : <0x31>
> >>    <1><3d>: Abbrev Number: 6 (DW_TAG_variable)
> >>       <3e>   DW_AT_name        : a
> >>       <40>   DW_AT_decl_file   : 1
> >>       <41>   DW_AT_decl_line   : 1
> >>       <42>   DW_AT_decl_column : 19
> >>       <43>   DW_AT_type        : <0x2c>
> >>       <47>   DW_AT_external    : 1
> >>       <47>   DW_AT_declaration : 1
> >>    <1><47>: Abbrev Number: 5 (DW_TAG_base_type)
> >>       <48>   DW_AT_byte_size   : 8
> >>       <49>   DW_AT_encoding    : 7        (unsigned)
> >>       <4a>   DW_AT_name        : (indirect string, offset: 0x1df2): long
> >> unsigned int
> >>    <1><4e>: Abbrev Number: 7 (DW_TAG_variable)
> >>       <4f>   DW_AT_specification: <0x3d>
> >>       <53>   DW_AT_decl_line   : 2
> >>       <54>   DW_AT_decl_column : 12
> >>       <55>   DW_AT_location    : 9 byte block: 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> >> (DW_OP_addr: 0)
> >>    <1><5f>: Abbrev Number: 0
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Indu
>

Reply via email to