On 7/27/2021 3:58 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 9:10 PM Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote:


On 7/2/2021 2:13 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:

On 7/2/21 12:20 AM, Jeff Law wrote:

On 6/28/2021 10:21 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
+// Internal construct to help facilitate debugging of solver.
+#define DEBUG_SOLVER getenv("DEBUG")
Shouldn't this really be a property of what pass is using the solver
and whether or not the appropriate dump flag is on for that pass?
Whoops.  This was a private construct used for debugging the solver.
I've changed it to:

+#define DEBUG_SOLVER (0 && dump_file)
I would probably argue that the #define should disappear and the code
should be checking the current dump state for the current pass.   If you
don't want to keep the debugging output, then remove it  :-)  I think
that can be handled in a follow-up patch.
The debugging output is really verbose, especially because the
threader will try a boatload of different paths all of which get their
propagation dumped.  Is there a recommended way of leaving the
debugging in the code, but only enabled sporadically?  Perhaps a
--param ??.  Or perhaps I could remove it near the end of stage 1?
You could make it conditional on TDF_DETAILS, which is what I think most passes do when they want the higher levels of verbosity.

ie

if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))

Jeff

Reply via email to