On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:07 PM Bill Schmidt <wschm...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 7/7/21 2:59 PM, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > [PATCH] Change rs6000_const_f32_to_i32 return type.
> >
> > The function rs6000_const_f32_to_i32 called REAL_VALUE_TO_TARGET_SINGLE
> > with a long long type and returns it. This patch changes the type to long
> > which is the proper type for REAL_VALUE_TO_TARGET_SINGLE.
> >
> > 2021-07-07 Michael Meissner <meiss...@linux.ibm.com>
> >
> > gcc/
> > * config/rs6000/rs6000-protos.h (rs6000_const_f32_to_i32): Change
> > return type to long.
> > * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_const_f32_to_i32): Change return
> > type to long.
> > ---
> > gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-protos.h | 2 +-
> > gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c | 6 ++++--
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-protos.h
> > b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-protos.h
> > index 9de294d3b28..94bf961c6b7 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-protos.h
> > +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-protos.h
> > @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ extern void rs6000_asm_output_dwarf_pcrel (FILE *file,
> > int size,
> > const char *label);
> > extern void rs6000_asm_output_dwarf_datarel (FILE *file, int size,
> > const char *label);
> > -extern long long rs6000_const_f32_to_i32 (rtx operand);
> > +extern long rs6000_const_f32_to_i32 (rtx operand);
> >
> > /* Declare functions in rs6000-c.c */
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
> > index 9a5db63d0ef..de11de5e079 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
> > +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
> > @@ -27936,10 +27936,12 @@ rs6000_invalid_conversion (const_tree fromtype,
> > const_tree totype)
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > -long long
> > +/* Convert a SFmode constant to the integer bit pattern. */
> > +
> > +long
> > rs6000_const_f32_to_i32 (rtx operand)
> > {
> > - long long value;
> > + long value;
> > const struct real_value *rv = CONST_DOUBLE_REAL_VALUE (operand);
> >
> > gcc_assert (GET_MODE (operand) == SFmode);
>
> These changes look OK. Can you please also fix the expander for
> xxspltiw_v4sf, which incorrectly expects a long long?
>
> I can't approve, but recommend approval with that also fixed.
This is okay with the fix to xxspltiw_v4sf in altivec.md. And please
update the ChangeLog appropriately.
Thanks, David
