Hi!

The following testcase ICEs during error-recovery, as build_c_cast calls
note_integer_operands on error_mark_node and that wraps it into
C_MAYBE_CONST_EXPR which is unexpected and causes ICE later on.
Seems most other callers of note_integer_operands check early if something
is error_mark_node and return before calling note_integer_operands on it.

The following patch fixes it by not calling on error_mark_node, another
possibility would be to handle error_mark_node in note_integer_operands and
just return it.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2021-06-24  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR c/101171
        * c-typeck.c (build_c_cast): Don't call note_integer_operands on
        error_mark_node.

        * gcc.dg/pr101171.c: New test.

--- gcc/c/c-typeck.c.jj 2021-06-23 13:33:00.375434219 +0200
+++ gcc/c/c-typeck.c    2021-06-23 17:51:17.501401208 +0200
@@ -6131,6 +6131,7 @@ build_c_cast (location_t loc, tree type,
      return value reflects this.  */
   if (int_operands
       && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
+      && value != error_mark_node
       && !EXPR_INT_CONST_OPERANDS (value))
     value = note_integer_operands (value);
 
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr101171.c.jj  2021-06-23 17:56:53.409896019 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr101171.c     2021-06-23 17:56:28.668227851 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* PR c/101171 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "" } */
+
+extern void foo (void);
+int x = 0x1234;
+
+void
+bar (void)
+{
+  if (x != (sizeof ((enum T) 0x1234))) /* { dg-error "conversion to incomplete 
type" } */
+    foo ();
+}

        Jakub

Reply via email to