On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> These builtins are:
> DEF_SYNC_BUILTIN (BUILT_IN_ATOMIC_ALWAYS_LOCK_FREE,
>                  "__atomic_always_lock_free",
>                  BT_FN_BOOL_SIZE_CONST_VPTR, ATTR_CONST_NOTHROW_LEAF_LIST)
>
> DEF_SYNC_BUILTIN (BUILT_IN_ATOMIC_IS_LOCK_FREE,
>                  "__atomic_is_lock_free",
>                  BT_FN_BOOL_SIZE_CONST_VPTR, ATTR_CONST_NOTHROW_LEAF_LIST)
> therefore return bool rather than int, but apparently the
> folders returned integer constants anyway, which e.g. on the following
> testcase leads to checking ICEs.
>
> Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for
> trunk?

Ok.

Thanks,
Richard.

> 2012-02-10  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
>
>        PR middle-end/52177
>        * builtins.c (fold_builtin_atomic_always_lock_free,
>        expand_builtin_atomic_always_lock_free,
>        fold_builtin_atomic_is_lock_free,
>        expand_builtin_atomic_is_lock_free): Return and/or test
>        boolean_true_node/boolean_false_node instead of
>        integer_one_node/integer_zero_node.
>
>        * c-c++-common/pr52177.c: New test.
>
> --- gcc/builtins.c.jj   2012-01-30 00:10:01.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/builtins.c      2012-02-10 09:37:37.719936106 +0100
> @@ -5639,15 +5639,15 @@ fold_builtin_atomic_always_lock_free (tr
>   /* If the object has smaller alignment, the the lock free routines cannot
>      be used.  */
>   if (type_align < mode_align)
> -    return integer_zero_node;
> +    return boolean_false_node;
>
>   /* Check if a compare_and_swap pattern exists for the mode which represents
>      the required size.  The pattern is not allowed to fail, so the existence
>      of the pattern indicates support is present.  */
>   if (can_compare_and_swap_p (mode, true))
> -    return integer_one_node;
> +    return boolean_true_node;
>   else
> -    return integer_zero_node;
> +    return boolean_false_node;
>  }
>
>  /* Return true if the parameters to call EXP represent an object which will
> @@ -5671,7 +5671,7 @@ expand_builtin_atomic_always_lock_free (
>     }
>
>   size = fold_builtin_atomic_always_lock_free (arg0, arg1);
> -  if (size == integer_one_node)
> +  if (size == boolean_true_node)
>     return const1_rtx;
>   return const0_rtx;
>  }
> @@ -5686,8 +5686,8 @@ fold_builtin_atomic_is_lock_free (tree a
>     return NULL_TREE;
>
>   /* If it isn't always lock free, don't generate a result.  */
> -  if (fold_builtin_atomic_always_lock_free (arg0, arg1) == integer_one_node)
> -    return integer_one_node;
> +  if (fold_builtin_atomic_always_lock_free (arg0, arg1) == boolean_true_node)
> +    return boolean_true_node;
>
>   return NULL_TREE;
>  }
> @@ -5717,7 +5717,7 @@ expand_builtin_atomic_is_lock_free (tree
>
>   /* If the value is known at compile time, return the RTX for it.  */
>   size = fold_builtin_atomic_is_lock_free (arg0, arg1);
> -  if (size == integer_one_node)
> +  if (size == boolean_true_node)
>     return const1_rtx;
>
>   return NULL_RTX;
> --- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr52177.c.jj     2012-02-10 09:46:27.175770110 
> +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr52177.c        2012-02-10 09:46:01.000000000 
> +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> +/* PR middle-end/52177 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O -fno-tree-ccp" } */
> +
> +int *s;
> +
> +static inline int
> +foo ()
> +{
> +  return sizeof (int);
> +}
> +
> +int
> +bar ()
> +{
> +  return __atomic_always_lock_free (foo (), s);
> +}
> +
> +int
> +baz ()
> +{
> +  return __atomic_is_lock_free (foo (), s);
> +}
>
>        Jakub

Reply via email to