On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 07:47:50PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Fails due to the (explicit or implicitly added) 'bind' clause as
> tree-nested.c did not handle them.
> 
> In convert_nonlocal_omp_clauses, the following clauses are
> missing: OMP_CLAUSE_AFFINITY, OMP_CLAUSE_DEVICE_TYPE,
> OMP_CLAUSE_EXCLUSIVE, OMP_CLAUSE_INCLUSIVE.
> 
> I am not sure which of them should or must be added – but the
> 'bind' clause for sure; I did add 'affinity' but it is currently
> removed during gimplification – hence, I think leaving it out
> would also be an option.
> 
> Lightly tested. OK once/when testing has succeeded?

Because OMP_CLAUSE_AFFINITY is dropped during gimplification,
I'd leave OMP_CLAUSE_AFFINITY out.  Ok for trunk with that change.

And OMP_CLAUSE_{EXCLUSIVE,INCLUSIVE} isn't needed, because we don't
walk the clauses at all for GIMPLE_OMP_SCAN.  It would be a bug
if we used the exclusive/inclusive operands after gimplification,
but we apparently don't do that, all we check is whether the
OMP_CLAUSE_KIND of the first clause (all should be the same) is
OMP_CLAUSE_EXCLUSIVE or OMP_CLAUSE_INCLUSIVE, nothing else.

That said, I think we should have a testcase, so I'll commit following
after testing:

2021-06-04  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        * gcc.dg/gomp/scan-1.c: New test.

--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gomp/scan-1.c.jj       2021-06-04 20:03:44.250674711 
+0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gomp/scan-1.c  2021-06-04 20:03:31.164851821 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+int baz (void);
+void qux (int);
+int r;
+
+int
+foo (void)
+{
+  int r = 0, i;
+  void bar (void) { r++; }
+  #pragma omp parallel for reduction(inscan, +:r)
+  for (i = 0; i < 64; i++)
+    {
+      r += baz ();
+      #pragma omp scan inclusive(r)
+      qux (r);
+    }
+  #pragma omp parallel for reduction(inscan, +:r)
+  for (i = 0; i < 64; i++)
+    {
+      qux (r);
+      #pragma omp scan exclusive(r)
+      r += baz ();
+    }
+  bar ();
+  return r;
+}
+
+int
+corge (void)
+{
+  int r = 0, i;
+  void bar (void)
+  {
+    #pragma omp parallel for reduction(inscan, +:r)
+    for (i = 0; i < 64; i++)
+      {
+       r += baz ();
+       #pragma omp scan inclusive(r)
+       qux (r);
+      }
+    #pragma omp parallel for reduction(inscan, +:r)
+    for (i = 0; i < 64; i++)
+      {
+       qux (r);
+       #pragma omp scan exclusive(r)
+       r += baz ();
+      }
+  }
+  bar ();
+  return r;
+}


        Jakub

Reply via email to