On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 08:50:56PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 05:13:16PM -0500, Paul A. Clarke wrote: > > + for (i = 0; i < NUM; i++) > > + src.s[i] = i * i - 68 * i + 1200; > > Could you do tests with some identical elements as well? Because that > is where I think it fails on BE currently.
Let me re-do the test case a bit more to provide a better set of input data, rather than this computational attempt which misses a bunch of interesting cases. I'll send a v2 in a bit. PC
