Hi. There's a fallout after my revision ebd5e86c0f41dc1d692f9b2b68a510b1f6835a3e. I would like to analyze all case and discuss possible solution. To be honest it's a can of worms and reverting the commit is an option on the table.
So the cases: 1) PR100759 - ppc64le $ cat pr.C #pragma GCC optimize 0 void main(); $ ./xgcc -B. -Os pr.C pr.C:2:11: internal compiler error: ‘global_options’ are modified in local context 2 | void main(); What happens: we change from -Os to -O0 and rs6000_isa_flags differ in cl_optimization_compare. Problem is that OPTION_MASK_SAVE_TOC_INDIRECT is set based on optimize flag: /* If we can shrink-wrap the TOC register save separately, then use -msave-toc-indirect unless explicitly disabled. */ if ((rs6000_isa_flags_explicit & OPTION_MASK_SAVE_TOC_INDIRECT) == 0 && flag_shrink_wrap_separate && optimize_function_for_speed_p (cfun)) rs6000_isa_flags |= OPTION_MASK_SAVE_TOC_INDIRECT; Suggested solution is doing: if ((rs6000_isa_flags_explicit & OPTION_MASK_SAVE_TOC_INDIRECT) == 0 && flag_shrink_wrap_separate rs6000_isa_flags |= OPTION_MASK_SAVE_TOC_INDIRECT; and add '&& optimize_function_for_speed_p (cfun)' to the place where the option mask is used. 2) Joseph's case: $ cat ~/Programming/testcases/opts-bug.i extern unsigned long int x; extern float f (float); extern __typeof (f) f_power8; extern __typeof (f) f_power9; extern __typeof (f) f __attribute__ ((ifunc ("f_ifunc"))); static __attribute__ ((optimize ("-fno-stack-protector"))) __typeof (f) * f_ifunc (void) { __typeof (f) *res = x ? f_power9 : f_power8; return res; } $ ./xgcc -B. ~/Programming/testcases/opts-bug.i -c -S -O2 -mlong-double-128 -mabi=ibmlongdouble /home/marxin/Programming/testcases/opts-bug.i:8:1: error: ‘-mabi=ibmlongdouble’ requires ‘-mlong-double-128’ This is caused by a weird option override: else if (rs6000_long_double_type_size == 128) rs6000_long_double_type_size = FLOAT_PRECISION_TFmode; (it's 127) later when rs6000_option_override_internal is called for saved target flags (127), it complains. Possible fix: else if (rs6000_long_double_type_size == 128 || rs6000_long_double_type_size == FLOAT_PRECISION_TFmode) 3) ARM issue reported here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98636#c20 arm_fp16_inst = bitmap_bit_p (arm_active_target.isa, isa_bit_fp16); if (arm_fp16_inst) { if (arm_fp16_format == ARM_FP16_FORMAT_ALTERNATIVE) error ("selected fp16 options are incompatible"); arm_fp16_format = ARM_FP16_FORMAT_IEEE; } there's likely missing else branch which would reset when arm_fp16_inst is null. Anyway, can be moved again to the ignored list 4) Jeff reported the following for v850-elf: $ cat ~/Programming/testcases/j.c typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t; extern inline __attribute__ ((__always_inline__, __gnu_inline__, __artificial__, __nothrow__, __leaf__)) void * memcpy (void *__restrict __dest, const void *__restrict __src, size_t __len) { return __builtin___memcpy_chk (__dest, __src, __len, __builtin_object_size (__dest, 0)); } __attribute__((optimize ("Ofast"))) void bar (void *d, void *s, size_t l) { memcpy (d, s, l); } $ ./xgcc -B. ~/Programming/testcases/j.c -S /home/marxin/Programming/testcases/j.c: In function ‘bar’: /home/marxin/Programming/testcases/j.c:4:1: error: inlining failed in call to ‘always_inline’ ‘memcpy’: target specific option mismatch 4 | memcpy (void *__restrict __dest, const void *__restrict __src, size_t __len) | ^~~~~~ /home/marxin/Programming/testcases/j.c:12:3: note: called from here 12 | memcpy (d, s, l); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This one is pretty clear. The target does: { OPT_LEVELS_1_PLUS, OPT_mprolog_function, NULL, 1 }, So it sets a target option based on optimize level. This one will need: diff --git a/gcc/config/v850/v850.c b/gcc/config/v850/v850.c index e0e5005d865..49f91f12766 100644 --- a/gcc/config/v850/v850.c +++ b/gcc/config/v850/v850.c @@ -3140,6 +3140,11 @@ v850_option_override (void) /* The RH850 ABI does not (currently) support the use of the CALLT instruction. */ if (! TARGET_GCC_ABI) target_flags |= MASK_DISABLE_CALLT; + + /* Save the initial options in case the user does function specific + options. */ + target_option_default_node = target_option_current_node + = build_target_option_node (&global_options, &global_options_set); } plus a custom can_inline_p target hook where the MASK_PROLOG_FUNCTION is ignored because caller does not have it set, while callee has. What target maintainers thing about it? Martin