On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 18:49, abebeos <lazaridis.com+abeb...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> (failed to join gcc, so posting here)
>
> Is there any private email where one can file complaints re
> project-maintainers (or "those who are supervising the maintainers") ?
>
> Is there any information about the process for such complaints?
>
> Related Issue: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100480
>
> (please note that this complaint will most possibly escalate up to the
> person(s) who are responsible for policies/rules)
>

This topic is "closed" for me (for now).

"
Now, the headline would be:

"Physik FU-Berlin, Microchip, Google, RedHat, IBM and more to Support
Abuse, Discrimination and even 'IT-fascism' via/on GCC/GNU/FSF
Project-Resources".

See, nobody cares, until a valid(!) headline gets some visibility.

But for now I'll stop here, as I don't want to open/activate accounts in
order to publish. And in the end, I would analyze GCC/GNU/FSF weaknesses
and threads without getting payed.

Just one last thing:

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, you have attacked my professional reputation in
public, saying more or less that I claimed the bounty without having done
any work for it.

But the indisputable fact is that any person that declares "assessment,
validation, integration and general reuse of existent results" as "copying"
should simply stay away from OSS software.

And persons which abuse their (position of) power to brute-force violate
voting procedures (or to not intervene), are just some (more or less worse)
form  of IT-fascists.

People like you should be kicked out immediately from OSS projects.

Well, at least in a perfect world.

Cu around, clowns.
"
source: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729#c61

Reply via email to