Hi,
This patch is to move rs6000_vect_nonmem (target cost_data
related information) into target cost_data struct.
Following Richi's comments in the thread[1], we can gather
data from add_stmt_cost invocations. This is one pre-step
to centralize target cost_data related stuffs.
Is it ok for trunk?
BR,
Kewen
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-May/569836.html
-----
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_vect_nonmem): Renamed to
vect_nonmem and moved into...
(struct rs6000_cost_data): ...here.
(rs6000_init_cost): Use vect_nonmem of cost_data instead.
(rs6000_add_stmt_cost): Likewise.
(rs6000_finish_cost): Likewise.
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
index 48b8efd732b..e2ff00145c5 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
@@ -5231,6 +5231,9 @@ typedef struct _rs6000_cost_data
{
struct loop *loop_info;
unsigned cost[3];
+ /* For each vectorized loop, this var holds TRUE iff a non-memory vector
+ instruction is needed by the vectorization. */
+ bool vect_nonmem;
} rs6000_cost_data;
/* Test for likely overcommitment of vector hardware resources. If a
@@ -5288,10 +5291,6 @@ rs6000_density_test (rs6000_cost_data *data)
/* Implement targetm.vectorize.init_cost. */
-/* For each vectorized loop, this var holds TRUE iff a non-memory vector
- instruction is needed by the vectorization. */
-static bool rs6000_vect_nonmem;
-
static void *
rs6000_init_cost (struct loop *loop_info)
{
@@ -5300,7 +5299,7 @@ rs6000_init_cost (struct loop *loop_info)
data->cost[vect_prologue] = 0;
data->cost[vect_body] = 0;
data->cost[vect_epilogue] = 0;
- rs6000_vect_nonmem = false;
+ data->vect_nonmem = false;
return data;
}
@@ -5360,7 +5359,7 @@ rs6000_add_stmt_cost (class vec_info *vinfo, void *data,
int count,
|| kind == vec_promote_demote || kind == vec_construct
|| kind == scalar_to_vec)
|| (where == vect_body && kind == vector_stmt))
- rs6000_vect_nonmem = true;
+ cost_data->vect_nonmem = true;
}
return retval;
@@ -5415,7 +5414,7 @@ rs6000_finish_cost (void *data, unsigned *prologue_cost,
if (cost_data->loop_info)
{
loop_vec_info vec_info = loop_vec_info_for_loop (cost_data->loop_info);
- if (!rs6000_vect_nonmem
+ if (!cost_data->vect_nonmem
&& LOOP_VINFO_VECT_FACTOR (vec_info) == 2
&& LOOP_REQUIRES_VERSIONING (vec_info))
cost_data->cost[vect_body] += 10000;
--
2.17.1
