On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 6:50 PM Robin Dapp via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the gimplefe40 and gimplefe41.c tests expect vector capabilities
> (vect_float etc.) yet are not in the vect subdirectory. This causes
> both to be called unconditionally without prior target-specific vector
> setup normally performed by vect/vect.exp.
>
> There is a target-specific option for powerpc
>
> /* { dg-additional-options "-maltivec" { target { powerpc*-*-* &&
> powerpc_altivec_ok } } } */
>
> which enables Altivec on supported targets but I'd rather not create
> another special case for s390. I suppose the better solution is to move
> these tests to the vect subdirectory.
>
> Is this OK?
Do the testcases currently fail? How? In principle moving to vect/
is OK but then having the gimplefe testcases in one place is nice ...
Richard.
> Regards
> Robin
>
> --
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/gimplefe-40.c: Moved to...
> * gcc.dg/vect/gimplefe-40.c: ...here.
> * gcc.dg/gimplefe-41.c: Moved to...
> * gcc.dg/vect/gimplefe-41.c: ...here.
