> On Apr 2, 2021, at 11:40 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > ... > I'm not excited about changing tools. I like that Texinfo is a GNU > project; AFACT, Sphinx is not. Why is that important? It's an open source tool, and if it better in interesting ways I don't see why its affiliation should matter. I view its support for ebook output as a major benefit, which as far as I know TexInfo does not offer. paul
- RFC: Sphinx for GCC documentation Martin Liška
- Re: RFC: Sphinx for GCC documentation Koning, Paul via Gcc-patches
- Re: RFC: Sphinx for GCC documentati... Martin Liška
- Re: RFC: Sphinx for GCC documen... Koning, Paul via Gcc-patches
- Re: RFC: Sphinx for GCC documentation Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
- Re: RFC: Sphinx for GCC documentation David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
- Re: RFC: Sphinx for GCC documentati... Martin Liška
- Re: RFC: Sphinx for GCC documentation Koning, Paul via Gcc-patches
- Re: RFC: Sphinx for GCC documentation Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
- Re: RFC: Sphinx for GCC documentati... Koning, Paul via Gcc-patches
- Re: RFC: Sphinx for GCC documentati... Martin Liška
- Re: RFC: Sphinx for GCC documen... Michael Matz
- Re: RFC: Sphinx for GCC doc... Joseph Myers
- Re: RFC: Sphinx for GC... Martin Liška
- Re: RFC: Sphinx for GCC documentation Martin Liška