On 2021-03-23 1:55 p.m., Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 17:54, Vladimir Makarov <vmaka...@redhat.com> wrote:
Can you check?
Sorry, I've rerun (cd gcc && make check-gcc) on gcc114 for today trunk
and I don't see the regressions mentioned above.
Can you check this too and if I am doing something wrong for testing,
please point me out.
I'm testing with cross-compilers with ST hat, but I'm not the only one
seeing these failures, see gcc-testresults.
Andreas and in Linaro we are both testing native compilers.
These tests are driven by aarch64-sve-acle-asm.exp
Is it possible that the binutils version matters? I'm using 2.34 for
the cross-toolchains.
Sorry, I looked at the tests in more details. They require
aarch64_asm_f64mm and gcc114.fsffrance.org is not that kind of machine.
Therefore they are not even compiled on this machine. As I understand
the tests should check the right assembler generation but the tests
require to be run.
The problem can be in necessity to use more relaxed memory constraints
for aarch64.
I'll investigate the regressions more.
