On 23/03/21 09:26 -0700, Thiago Macieira via Libstdc++ wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 March 2021 08:39:43 PDT Thomas Rodgers wrote:
I will be submitting a new patch for the
atomic.wait/barrier/latch/semaphore functionality a bit later today that
subsumes the changes to atomic_wait and latch, and includes the changes
to barrier.
Thanks, Thomas
Is that meant to be part of GCC 11's release?
Yes.
If not, what do we do about preventing the future BC break and potential
heisenbugs?
1) do nothing, accept they will happen silently
This is our current policy for experimental features and it isn't
going to change for GCC 11.
2) cause non-silent BC breaks
3) disable the code for now (unless explicitly opted-in)
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel DPG Cloud Engineering
