The new gcc.target/i386/pr95798-?.c tests FAIL on 64-bit Solaris/x86:
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c scan-assembler 1,
8\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\)
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c scan-assembler 2,
16\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\)
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c scan-assembler 3,
24\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\)
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c scan-assembler 4,
32\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\)
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c scan-assembler 5,
40\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\)
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c scan-assembler 6,
48\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\)
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c scan-assembler 7,
56\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\)
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c scan-assembler 1,
8\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\)
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c scan-assembler 2,
16\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\)
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c scan-assembler 3,
24\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\)
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c scan-assembler 4,
32\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\)
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c scan-assembler 5,
40\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\)
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c scan-assembler 6,
48\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\)
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c scan-assembler 7,
56\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\)
This happens because Solaris/amd64 defaults to -fno-omit-frame-pointer
and can be avoided by always passing -fomit-frame-pointer.
Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Ok for master?
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
2021-03-02 Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de>
gcc/testsuite:
* gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c: Add -fomit-frame-pointer to
dg-options.
* gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c: Likewise.
# HG changeset patch
# Parent bedda525d3ac004d2d10680b74fcadf8324f1b5c
testsuite: i386: Fix gcc.target/i386/pr95798-?.c on Solaris
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* PR target/95798 */
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -masm=att" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -masm=att -fomit-frame-pointer" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "1, 8\\\(%rsp,%r\[a-z0-9]*,8\\\)" { target lp64 } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "2, 16\\\(%rsp,%r\[a-z0-9]*,8\\\)" { target lp64 } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "3, 24\\\(%rsp,%r\[a-z0-9]*,8\\\)" { target lp64 } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* PR target/95798 */
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -masm=att" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -masm=att -fomit-frame-pointer" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "1, 8\\\(%rsp,%r\[a-z0-9]*,8\\\)" { target lp64 } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "2, 16\\\(%rsp,%r\[a-z0-9]*,8\\\)" { target lp64 } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "3, 24\\\(%rsp,%r\[a-z0-9]*,8\\\)" { target lp64 } } } */
