Hi Kito,
Kito Cheng <kito.ch...@gmail.com> writes: > I just spend some time on those two testcase, I think this those two > testcase could just skip in big-endinan. Well, that sounds like a pretty big cop out. If the software doesn't behave like we expect it too I feel we should at least have some idea _why_... >> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/shift-and-1.c scan-assembler-not andi >> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/shift-and-2.c scan-assembler-not andi > > However seems like rv32be has still has some strange fail there, > do you mind take a look for that? Do you mean in those two test cases specifically? Or rv32be in general? // Marcus
