On Feb 23, 2021, Jim Wilson <j...@sifive.com> wrote: > If we add default multilibs for you, then to be fair, we need to add > default multilibs for other people that ask, and before long we are trying > to build hundreds or maybe even thousands of multilibs by default which is > unworkable.
*nod*, it's a very familiar issue to me, I know where that's coming from, no worries. I expected the change would be turned down, and for good reason, unless there was say an emerging growth of adoption on those multilibs, which I wasn't aware of. The expectation didn't stop me from offering the patch just in case, that's all. > People that want a different set can define their own, and we have > made it easy for people to define their own sets of multilibs as Kito > pointed out. *nod*, thanks, -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/ Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer Vim, Vi, Voltei pro Emacs -- GNUlius Caesar
