Hi Jim: I think this patch is small enough to accept without FSF copyright assignment, and he is also on the way of the process, what do you think?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 2:44 PM Xing GUO <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Kito, > > I’ve sent my assignments and my school’s disclaimer to [email protected] > ([gnu.org #1673033] Xing GUO), but I haven’t got response so far. Not sure if > this patch can be accepted as a small bugfix patch. If not, I’m happy to > wait until FSF prove it. > > Best Regards, > Xing > > On Jan 22, 2021, at 2:26 PM, Kito Cheng <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Xing: > > Thanks for your patch, but I would like to know did you have the > copyright assignment for FSF? or your employee/company has signed > that? > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 8:48 PM Xing GUO via Gcc-patches > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This patch fixes -march option parsing when `p` extension exists, > e.g., -march=rv64imafdcp should produce > > .attribute arch, "rv64i2p0_m2p0_a2p0_f2p0_d2p0_c2p0_p" > > rather than > > .attribute arch, "rv64i2p0_m2p0_a2p0_f2p0_d2p0_c_p" > > --- > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * common/config/riscv/riscv-common.c > (riscv_subset_list::parsing_subset_version): > Fix -march option parsing when `p` extension exists. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gcc.target/riscv/attribute-18.c: New test. > -- > > Cheers, > Xing > >
