As reported this now XPASSes with ranger.
Tested on i?86-linux, pushed.
2021-01-21 Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
* gcc.dg/Walloca-2.c: Un-XFAIL.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Walloca-2.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Walloca-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Walloca-2.c
index 1cf9165c59f..c81813e0daa 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Walloca-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Walloca-2.c
@@ -9,11 +9,7 @@ g1 (int n)
{
void *p;
if (n > 0 && n < 2000)
- // FIXME: This is a bogus warning, and is currently happening on
- // 32-bit targets because VRP is not giving us any range info for
- // the argument to __builtin_alloca. This should be fixed by the
- // upcoming range work.
- p = __builtin_alloca (n); // { dg-bogus "unbounded use of 'alloca'" "" {
xfail { ! lp64 } } }
+ p = __builtin_alloca (n); // { dg-bogus "unbounded use of 'alloca'" "" }
else
p = __builtin_malloc (n);
f (p);
--
2.26.2
