On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:43:13PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:59:19AM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > >From 78435dee177447080434cdc08fc76b1029c7f576 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Michael Meissner <meiss...@linux.ibm.com>
> > Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 21:47:03 -0500
> > Subject: [PATCH] PowerPC: Map IEEE 128-bit long double built-ins.
> > 
> > This patch replaces patches previously submitted:
> 
> What did you change after I approved it?

You grumbled about the way I converted the names from the current name to the
IEEE 128-bit name as being unclear.

1) I moved the table of known mappings from within a function to a separate
function, and I populated the switch statement with all of the current names.

2) I moved the code that looks at a built-in function's arguments and returns
whether it uses long double to a separate function rather than being buried
within a larger function.

3) I changed the code for case we we didn't provide a name (i.e. new built-ins)
to hopefully be clearer on the conversion.

-- 
Michael Meissner, IBM
IBM, M/S 2506R, 550 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460-6245, USA
email: meiss...@linux.ibm.com, phone: +1 (978) 899-4797

Reply via email to