On 1/19/21 5:36 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:50:56PM -0500, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, John David Anglin wrote:
>>>> The hppa target is a reload target and asm goto is not supported on reload
>>>> targets.
>>>> Skip failing tests on hppa.
>>> IIUC the preferred term is "IRA target" or maybe "non-LRA
>>> target", as opposed to "LRA target". The tests fail for
>>> cris-elf too, another IRA target, so I'd like to use that term
>>> when adjusting the dg-skip-if, hope you don't mind.
>>>
>>> But also, I'd like to xfail it instead for cris-elf, which adds
>>> a caveat: people might then think a "reload target" is not the
>>> same as an "IRA target", what with the different adjustments.
>> I think "IRA target" is not the right term, all targets are IRA targets,
>> but only some are using LRA and others use the old reload.
> But, IRA isn't used when... Whatever; LRA and non-LRA then.
> I'll call the suggested testsuite target-supports predicate
> "lra" (thanks Andreas S.; of course!), to be used negated here.
Well we could do that. But instead I propose we drop reload for gcc-12
now that cc0 is dead (yea, yea, we need to get the avr conversion
reviewed first...)
Jeff
