On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:05 PM H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> -fcf-protection with CF_BRANCH inserts ENDBR32 at function entries.
> ENDBR32 is NOP only on 64-bit processors and 32-bit TARGET_CMOVE
> processors.  Issue an error for -fcf-protection with CF_BRANCH when
> compiling for 32-bit non-TARGET_CMOVE targets.
>
> gcc/
>
>         PR target/98667
>         * config/i386/i386-options.c (ix86_option_override_internal):
>         Issue an error for -fcf-protection with CF_BRANCH when compiling
>         for 32-bit non-TARGET_CMOVE targets.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
>         PR target/98667
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr98667-1.c: New file.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr98667-2.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr98667-3.c: Likewise.
> ---
>  gcc/config/i386/i386-options.c            | 9 ++++++++-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr98667-1.c | 9 +++++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr98667-2.c | 9 +++++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr98667-3.c | 7 +++++++
>  4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr98667-1.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr98667-2.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr98667-3.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.c
> index 4e0165ff32c..1489871b36f 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.c
> @@ -3016,8 +3016,15 @@ ix86_option_override_internal (bool main_args_p,
>      }
>
>    if (opts->x_flag_cf_protection != CF_NONE)
> -    opts->x_flag_cf_protection
> +    {
> +      if ((opts->x_flag_cf_protection & CF_BRANCH) == CF_BRANCH
> +         && !TARGET_64BIT
> +         && !TARGET_CMOVE)

You need TARGET_CMOV (note, no E) here. Also, please put both tests on one line.

LGTM with the above change.

Thanks,
Uros.

> +       error ("%<-fcf-protection%> is not compatible with this target");
> +
> +      opts->x_flag_cf_protection
>        = (cf_protection_level) (opts->x_flag_cf_protection | CF_SET);
> +    }
>
>    if (ix86_tune_features [X86_TUNE_AVOID_256FMA_CHAINS])
>      SET_OPTION_IF_UNSET (opts, opts_set, param_avoid_fma_max_bits, 256);
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr98667-1.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr98667-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..5bf0c9285a8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr98667-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile { target ia32 } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fcf-protection -march=i486" } */
> +
> +void
> +test (void)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-error "'-fcf-protection' is not compatible with this target" "" { 
> target *-*-* } 0 } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr98667-2.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr98667-2.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..bc3a78c9641
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr98667-2.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile { target ia32 } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fcf-protection=branch -march=i486" } */
> +
> +void
> +test (void)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-error "'-fcf-protection' is not compatible with this target" "" { 
> target *-*-* } 0 } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr98667-3.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr98667-3.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..a6ea6d04331
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr98667-3.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile { target ia32 } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fcf-protection=return -march=i486" } */
> +
> +void
> +test (void)
> +{
> +}
> --
> 2.29.2
>

Reply via email to