On Mon, 28 Dec 2020, Tamar Christina wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> This adds support for FMS and FMS conjugated to the slp pattern matcher.
> 
> Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> and no issues.
> 
> Ok for master?

Interestingly this patch looks different from the FMA one(!?).  I
would have expected to have the same pattern for FMA and FMS in the
end.

> Thanks,
> Tamar
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
>       * internal-fn.def (COMPLEX_FMS, COMPLEX_FMS_CONJ): New.
>       * optabs.def (cmls_optab, cmls_conj_optab): New.
>       * doc/md.texi: Document them.
>       * tree-vect-slp-patterns.c (class complex_fms_pattern,
>       complex_fms_pattern::matches, complex_fms_pattern::recognize,
>       complex_fms_pattern::build): New.
> 
> --- inline copy of patch -- 
> diff --git a/gcc/doc/md.texi b/gcc/doc/md.texi
> index 
> 6d5a98c4946d3ff4c2b8abea5c29caa6863fd3f7..3f5a42df285b3ee162edc9ec661f25c0eec5e4fa
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/doc/md.texi
> +++ b/gcc/doc/md.texi
> @@ -6247,6 +6247,51 @@ The operation is only supported for vector modes 
> @var{m}.
>  
>  This pattern is not allowed to @code{FAIL}.
>  
> +@cindex @code{cmls@var{m}4} instruction pattern
> +@item @samp{cmls@var{m}4}
> +Perform a vector multiply and subtract that is semantically the same as
> +a multiply and subtract of complex numbers.
> +
> +@smallexample
> +  complex TYPE c[N];
> +  complex TYPE a[N];
> +  complex TYPE b[N];
> +  for (int i = 0; i < N; i += 1)
> +    @{
> +      c[i] -= a[i] * b[i];
> +    @}
> +@end smallexample
> +
> +In GCC lane ordering the real part of the number must be in the even lanes 
> with
> +the imaginary part in the odd lanes.
> +
> +The operation is only supported for vector modes @var{m}.
> +
> +This pattern is not allowed to @code{FAIL}.
> +
> +@cindex @code{cmls_conj@var{m}4} instruction pattern
> +@item @samp{cmls_conj@var{m}4}
> +Perform a vector multiply by conjugate and subtract that is semantically
> +the same as a multiply and subtract of complex numbers where the second
> +multiply arguments is conjugated.
> +
> +@smallexample
> +  complex TYPE c[N];
> +  complex TYPE a[N];
> +  complex TYPE b[N];
> +  for (int i = 0; i < N; i += 1)
> +    @{
> +      c[i] -= a[i] * conj (b[i]);
> +    @}
> +@end smallexample
> +
> +In GCC lane ordering the real part of the number must be in the even lanes 
> with
> +the imaginary part in the odd lanes.
> +
> +The operation is only supported for vector modes @var{m}.
> +
> +This pattern is not allowed to @code{FAIL}.
> +
>  @cindex @code{cmul@var{m}4} instruction pattern
>  @item @samp{cmul@var{m}4}
>  Perform a vector multiply that is semantically the same as multiply of
> diff --git a/gcc/internal-fn.def b/gcc/internal-fn.def
> index 
> 305450e026d4b94ab62ceb9ca719ec5570ff43eb..c8161509d9497afe58f32bde12d8e6bd7b876a3c
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/internal-fn.def
> +++ b/gcc/internal-fn.def
> @@ -290,6 +290,8 @@ DEF_INTERNAL_FLT_FN (LDEXP, ECF_CONST, ldexp, binary)
>  DEF_INTERNAL_FLT_FLOATN_FN (FMA, ECF_CONST, fma, ternary)
>  DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN (COMPLEX_FMA, ECF_CONST, cmla, ternary)
>  DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN (COMPLEX_FMA_CONJ, ECF_CONST, cmla_conj, ternary)
> +DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN (COMPLEX_FMS, ECF_CONST, cmls, ternary)
> +DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN (COMPLEX_FMS_CONJ, ECF_CONST, cmls_conj, ternary)
>  
>  /* Unary integer ops.  */
>  DEF_INTERNAL_INT_FN (CLRSB, ECF_CONST | ECF_NOTHROW, clrsb, unary)
> diff --git a/gcc/optabs.def b/gcc/optabs.def
> index 
> 8e2758d685ed85e02df10dac571eb40d45a294ed..320bb5f3dce31867d312bbbb6a4c6e31c534254e
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/optabs.def
> +++ b/gcc/optabs.def
> @@ -296,6 +296,8 @@ OPTAB_D (cmul_optab, "cmul$a3")
>  OPTAB_D (cmul_conj_optab, "cmul_conj$a3")
>  OPTAB_D (cmla_optab, "cmla$a4")
>  OPTAB_D (cmla_conj_optab, "cmla_conj$a4")
> +OPTAB_D (cmls_optab, "cmls$a4")
> +OPTAB_D (cmls_conj_optab, "cmls_conj$a4")
>  OPTAB_D (cos_optab, "cos$a2")
>  OPTAB_D (cosh_optab, "cosh$a2")
>  OPTAB_D (exp10_optab, "exp10$a2")
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-slp-patterns.c b/gcc/tree-vect-slp-patterns.c
> index 
> 3625a80c08e3d70fd362fc52e17e65b3b2c7da83..ab6587f0b8522ec5f916f74e7e7401b1f7a35bbb
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-slp-patterns.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-slp-patterns.c
> @@ -1254,6 +1254,181 @@ complex_fma_pattern::build (vec_info *vinfo)
>    complex_pattern::build (vinfo);
>  }
>  
> +/*******************************************************************************
> + * complex_fms_pattern class
> + 
> ******************************************************************************/
> +
> +class complex_fms_pattern : public complex_pattern
> +{
> +  protected:
> +    complex_fms_pattern (slp_tree *node, vec<slp_tree> *m_ops, internal_fn 
> ifn)
> +      : complex_pattern (node, m_ops, ifn)
> +    {
> +      this->m_num_args = 3;
> +    }
> +
> +  public:
> +    void build (vec_info *);
> +    static internal_fn
> +    matches (complex_operation_t op, slp_tree_to_load_perm_map_t *, slp_tree 
> *,
> +          vec<slp_tree> *);
> +
> +    static vect_pattern*
> +    recognize (slp_tree_to_load_perm_map_t *, slp_tree *);
> +
> +    static vect_pattern*
> +    mkInstance (slp_tree *node, vec<slp_tree> *m_ops, internal_fn ifn)
> +    {
> +      return new complex_fms_pattern (node, m_ops, ifn);
> +    }
> +};
> +
> +
> +/* Pattern matcher for trying to match complex multiply and accumulate
> +   and multiply and subtract patterns in SLP tree.
> +   If the operation matches then IFN is set to the operation it matched and
> +   the arguments to the two replacement statements are put in m_ops.
> +
> +   If no match is found then IFN is set to IFN_LAST and m_ops is unchanged.
> +
> +   This function matches the patterns shaped as:
> +
> +   double ax = (b[i+1] * a[i]) + (b[i] * a[i]);
> +   double bx = (a[i+1] * b[i]) - (a[i+1] * b[i+1]);
> +
> +   c[i] = c[i] - ax;
> +   c[i+1] = c[i+1] + bx;
> +
> +   If a match occurred then TRUE is returned, else FALSE.  The initial match 
> is
> +   expected to be in OP1 and the initial match operands in args0.  */
> +
> +internal_fn
> +complex_fms_pattern::matches (complex_operation_t op,
> +                           slp_tree_to_load_perm_map_t *perm_cache,
> +                           slp_tree * ref_node, vec<slp_tree> *ops)
> +{
> +  internal_fn ifn = IFN_LAST;
> +
> +  /* Find the two components.  We match Complex MUL first which reduces the
> +     amount of work this pattern has to do.  After that we just match the
> +     head node and we're done.:
> +
> +     * FMS: - +.  */
> +  slp_tree child = NULL;
> +
> +  /* We need to ignore the two_operands nodes that may also match,
> +     for that we can check if they have any scalar statements and also
> +     check that it's not a permute node as we're looking for a normal
> +     PLUS_EXPR operation.  */
> +  if (op != PLUS_MINUS)
> +    return IFN_LAST;
> +
> +  child = SLP_TREE_CHILDREN ((*ops)[1])[1];
> +  if (vect_detect_pair_op (child) != MINUS_PLUS)
> +    return IFN_LAST;
> +
> +  /* First two nodes must be a multiply.  */
> +  auto_vec<slp_tree> muls;
> +  if (vect_match_call_complex_mla (child, 0) != MULT_MULT
> +      || vect_match_call_complex_mla (child, 1, &muls) != MULT_MULT)
> +    return IFN_LAST;
> +
> +  /* Now operand2+4 may lead to another expression.  */
> +  auto_vec<slp_tree> left_op, right_op;
> +  left_op.safe_splice (SLP_TREE_CHILDREN (muls[0]));
> +  right_op.safe_splice (SLP_TREE_CHILDREN (muls[1]));
> +
> +  bool is_neg = vect_normalize_conj_loc (left_op);
> +
> +  child = SLP_TREE_CHILDREN ((*ops)[1])[0];
> +  bool conj_first_operand;
> +  if (!vect_validate_multiplication (perm_cache, right_op, left_op, false,
> +                                  &conj_first_operand, true))
> +    return IFN_LAST;
> +
> +  if (!is_neg)
> +    ifn = IFN_COMPLEX_FMS;
> +  else if (is_neg)
> +    ifn = IFN_COMPLEX_FMS_CONJ;
> +
> +  if (!vect_pattern_validate_optab (ifn, *ref_node))
> +    return IFN_LAST;
> +
> +  ops->truncate (0);
> +  ops->create (4);
> +
> +  complex_perm_kinds_t kind = linear_loads_p (perm_cache, right_op[0]).first;
> +  if (kind == PERM_EVENODD)
> +    {
> +      ops->quick_push (child);
> +      ops->quick_push (right_op[0]);
> +      ops->quick_push (right_op[1]);
> +      ops->quick_push (left_op[0]);
> +    }
> +  else if (kind == PERM_TOP)
> +    {
> +      ops->quick_push (child);
> +      ops->quick_push (right_op[1]);
> +      ops->quick_push (right_op[0]);
> +      ops->quick_push (left_op[0]);
> +    }
> +  else
> +    {
> +      ops->quick_push (child);
> +      ops->quick_push (right_op[1]);
> +      ops->quick_push (right_op[0]);
> +      ops->quick_push (left_op[1]);
> +    }
> +
> +  return ifn;
> +}
> +
> +/* Attempt to recognize a complex mul pattern.  */
> +
> +vect_pattern*
> +complex_fms_pattern::recognize (slp_tree_to_load_perm_map_t *perm_cache,
> +                             slp_tree *node)
> +{
> +  auto_vec<slp_tree> ops;
> +  complex_operation_t op
> +    = vect_detect_pair_op (*node, true, &ops);
> +  internal_fn ifn
> +    = complex_fms_pattern::matches (op, perm_cache, node, &ops);
> +  if (ifn == IFN_LAST)
> +    return NULL;
> +
> +  return new complex_fms_pattern (node, &ops, ifn);
> +}
> +
> +/* Perform a replacement of the detected complex mul pattern with the new
> +   instruction sequences.  */
> +
> +void
> +complex_fms_pattern::build (vec_info *vinfo)
> +{
> +  auto_vec<slp_tree> nodes;
> +
> +  /* First re-arrange the children.  */
> +  nodes.create (3);
> +
> +  nodes.quick_push (this->m_ops[0]);
> +  nodes.quick_push (this->m_ops[1]);
> +  nodes.quick_push (
> +    vect_build_combine_node (this->m_ops[2], this->m_ops[3], *this->m_node));
> +  SLP_TREE_REF_COUNT (this->m_ops[0])++;
> +  SLP_TREE_REF_COUNT (this->m_ops[1])++;
> +
> +  slp_tree node;
> +  unsigned i;
> +  FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (SLP_TREE_CHILDREN (*this->m_node), i, node)
> +    vect_free_slp_tree (node);
> +
> +  SLP_TREE_CHILDREN (*this->m_node).truncate (0);
> +  SLP_TREE_CHILDREN (*this->m_node).safe_splice (nodes);

please elide the nodes vector.

Otherwise OK.
Richard.

> +
> +  complex_pattern::build (vinfo);
> +}
> +
>  
> /*******************************************************************************
>   * Pattern matching definitions
>   
> ******************************************************************************/
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Felix Imendörffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to