Ping!

On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 at 10:38, Paul Richard Thomas <
paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Fortran: Fix some select rank issues [PR97694 and 97723].
>
> Hi All,
>
> Unlike select type, select rank selectors retain the allocatable
> attribute. This is corrected by the chunk in check.c. Note the trailing
> whitespace corrections. Resolution of select rank construct must be done in
> the same way as select type and so the break has been added to ensure that
> the block is resolved in resolve_select_rank. The final chunk prevents
> segfaults for class associate variables that are optional dummies, since
> these apparently are not adorned with the GFC_DECL_SAVED_DESCRIPTOR.
>
> Regtests OK on FC31/x86_64 - OK for master?
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
>
> 2020-12-12  Paul Thomas  <pa...@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> gcc/fortran
> PR fortran/97694
> PR fortran/97723
> * check.c (allocatable_check): Select rank temporaries are
> permitted even though they are treated as associate variables.
> * resolve.c (gfc_resolve_code): Break on select rank as well as
> select type so that the block os resolved.
> * trans-stmt.c (trans_associate_var): Class associate variables
> that are optional dummies must use the backend_decl.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> PR fortran/97694
> PR fortran/97723
> * gfortran.dg/select_rank_5.f90: New test.
>
>

-- 
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" -
Albert Einstein

Reply via email to