> -----Original Message----- > From: Dennis Zhang <dennis.zh...@arm.com> > Sent: 10 December 2020 14:35 > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: nd <n...@arm.com>; Richard Earnshaw <richard.earns...@arm.com>; > Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcr...@arm.com>; Kyrylo Tkachov > <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>; Richard Sandiford > <richard.sandif...@arm.com> > Subject: [backport gcc-10][AArch64] ACLE bf16 get > > Hi all, > > This patch backports the commit > 3553c658533e430b232997bdfd97faf6606fb102. > The original is approved at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020- > November/557871.html > There is a change to remove FPCR-reading flag for builtin declaration since > it's not supported in gcc-10. > > Another change is to remove a test (bf16_get-be.c) that fails compiling on > aarch64-none-linux-gnu in the original patch. > This is reported at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020- > November/558195.html > The failure happens for several bf16 big-endian tests so the bug would be > fixed in a separate patch. > And the test should be added after the bug is fixed. > > Is it OK to backport? But do the tests added here work for big-endian? Ok if they do. Thanks, Kyrill > > Cheers > Dennis
RE: [backport gcc-10][AArch64] ACLE bf16 get
Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches Fri, 11 Dec 2020 03:58:40 -0800
- [backport gcc-10][AArch64] ACLE bf16 conver... Dennis Zhang via Gcc-patches
- [backport gcc-10][AArch64] ACLE bf16 g... Dennis Zhang via Gcc-patches
- RE: [backport gcc-10][AArch64] ACL... Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches
- Re: [backport gcc-10][AArch64]... Dennis Zhang via Gcc-patches
- RE: [backport gcc-10][AArch64] ACLE bf... Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches
- Re: [backport gcc-10][AArch64] ACL... Dennis Zhang via Gcc-patches