Hi! I have noticed that while we use DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14 for -std=c++17 -gdwarf-5, we use DW_LANG_C_plus_plus (aka C++98) for -std=c++20 -gdwarf-5. The following patch makes those two match.
Ok for trunk if it passes bootstrap/regtest? 2020-11-30 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> * dwarf2out.c (gen_compile_unit_die): Treat GNU C++20 like C++14 for -gdwarf-5. * g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/lang-cpp17.C: New test. * g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/lang-cpp20.C: New test. --- gcc/dwarf2out.c.jj 2020-11-26 16:22:29.111352844 +0100 +++ gcc/dwarf2out.c 2020-11-30 15:05:52.601317310 +0100 @@ -24646,7 +24646,8 @@ gen_compile_unit_die (const char *filena language = DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_11; else if (strcmp (language_string, "GNU C++14") == 0) language = DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14; - else if (strcmp (language_string, "GNU C++17") == 0) + else if (strcmp (language_string, "GNU C++17") == 0 + || strcmp (language_string, "GNU C++20") == 0) /* For now. */ language = DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14; } --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/lang-cpp17.C.jj 2020-11-30 15:06:35.631836747 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/lang-cpp17.C 2020-11-30 15:07:19.160350623 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +// { dg-do compile } +// { dg-options "-O -std=c++17 -gdwarf-5 -dA" } +// For -gdwarf-6 hopefully DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_17 +// DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14 = 0x0021 +// { dg-final { scan-assembler "0x21\[^\n\r]* DW_AT_language" } } */ + +int version; --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/lang-cpp20.C.jj 2020-11-30 15:07:27.436258201 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/lang-cpp20.C 2020-11-30 15:07:37.801142442 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +// { dg-do compile } +// { dg-options "-O -std=c++20 -gdwarf-5 -dA" } +// For -gdwarf-6 hopefully DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_20 +// DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14 = 0x0021 +// { dg-final { scan-assembler "0x21\[^\n\r]* DW_AT_language" } } */ + +int version; Jakub